What is Pre-Revenue Funding?

Matt Preuss
Marketing Manager

Raising venture capital for your startup is difficult. Raising venture capital for your startup with little to no revenue can feel impossible. However, venture capital funds have started to invest earlier and earlier into startups. The emergence of pre-seed rounds has led to more interest in pre-revenue startups.

Related Resources: All Encompassing Startup Fundraising Guide & Seed Funding for Startups 101: A Complete Guide

Start Your Free Account
Raise your next round, update investors, and track engagement all in one place.
Get Visible Free
No credit card required • Free Starter plan

Luckily, there are countless startups that have done it before. In order to better help founders navigate a fundraise with little to no revenue, we break down lessons from startups and investors that have taken part in a pre-revenue funding round below:

What is Pre-Revenue Funding?

Pre-revenue funding is equity or debt financing for companies that have yet to generate revenue. Pre-revenue funding can apply to companies across different sectors, markets, verticals, etc. Startups might have a product or a product in development but have yet to take it to market. Pre-revenue funding generally helps a company at this stage build its product or put a go-to-market motion to practice.

Related Resource: The Understandable Guide to Startup Funding Stages

What Does It Mean To Be Pre-Revenue?

Pre-revenue startups can be at varying stages in their startup lifecycle. For example, if a company is working on an incredibly large scale project revenue might come much later in its lifecycle. On the other hand, there might be companies that have developed a product and are ready to take it to market but need capital to hire talent and put their product and distribution to work. For the sake of this post, we will generally be speaking of companies

Related resource: 8 Startup Valuation Techniques and Factors to ConsiderWhat Does the DCF Formula Tell You?

How Do Startup Founders Get Pre-Revenue Funding?

The most common form of funding to receive before revenue is venture capital. Startups and venture capital funds generally follow a power law curve. This means that investors need to find a few companies that can generate massive returns for their LPs. Because of this, they are willing to invest in more companies at early stages in return for a larger equity percentage with the hope that a few of the companies will pan out to generate huge returns.

Related Resource: Understanding Power Law Curves to Better Your Chances of Raising Venture Capital

In order to improve your odds of raising capital at the pre-revenue stage, you need to understand the VC thought process and demonstrate why you can grow into a company that will generate returns for its investors/LPs.

How Investors Evaluate Pre-Revenue Startups

Every startup investor will use a different method or style to evaluate potential investments, especially pre-revenue startups. Understanding how venture capitalists think about making investments will greatly increase your odds of raising a round. Check out a few of the common methods and valuation styles below:

Related Resource: A Quick Overview on VC Fund Structure

1) The Berkus Method

As we wrote in our post, Valuing Startups: 10 Popular Methods, “The Berkus Method is an attempted way to assess value without the traditional revenue metrics that many methods take into account for more mature organizations.

The Berkus Method quantifies value by assessing qualitative qualities instead of quantitative ones. Value is assessed in the Berkus Method with five main elements. The elements considered within the Berkus Method include value business model (base value), available prototype to assess the technology risk and viability, founding team members and their abilities or industry knowledge, strategic relationships within the space or team, existing customers or first sales that prove viability. A quantitative value can be tied to each relevant quantitative factor with the Berkus Method.”

Start Your Free Account
Raise your next round, update investors, and track engagement all in one place.
Get Visible Free
No credit card required • Free Starter plan

2) Risk Factor Summation Method

As we wrote in our post, Valuing Startups: 10 Popular Methods, “The Risk Factor Summation Method is used with risk as the primary method for evaluation. This approach values a startup by taking into quantitative consideration all risks associated with the business that can affect the return on investment.

An initial value is calculated (possibly even using one of the other methods discussed in this post) and then the risks are assessed, deducting or adding to the initial value calculation based on said risks to the return. Some of the different kinds of risks that are taken into account are managing risk, political risk, manufacturing risk, market competition risk, investment and capital accumulation risk, technological risk, and legal environment risk.”

3) Venture Capital Method

As we wrote in our post, Valuing Startups: 10 Popular Methods, “This method is one of the most common, if not the most common method used for evaluating startups that are pre-cash flow and seeking VC investment. The VC Method looks at 6 steps to determine valuation:

  • Estimate the Investment Needed
  • Forecast Startup Financials
  • Determine the Timing of Exit (IPO, M&A, etc.)
  • Calculate Multiple at Exit (based on comps)
  • Discount to PV at the Desired Rate of Return
  • Determine Valuation and Desired Ownership Stake

It’s ultimately a quick, rough estimate informed by as much information as is available based on the market, comps, any existing quantitative and qualitative info from the company at hand, and an assumed amount of risk from the VC Firm.”

5) Scorecard Method

As we wrote in our post, Valuing Startups: 10 Popular Methods, “This valuation method looks at these similar companies and sees what types of valuation they received from other investors. From there, the median will be calculated from the value of all the similar companies’ valuations and this median will determine the average value of the target company. In addition to the median value placed on the competitive landscape, scorecards are looking at the strengths and weaknesses of the market as assessed by other investors and score their investment in question weighted with the following criteria compared to the other companies in the space:

  • Board, entrepreneur, the management team – 25%
  • Size of opportunity – 20%
  • Technology/Product – 18%
  • Marketing/Sales – 15%
  • Need for additional financing – 10%
  • Others – 10%

A company may be valued higher than the median with the scorecard method if the size of opportunity or board/management team is exceptional quality or vice versa, may be docked if the tech is strong but the leadership is assessed as in-experienced.”

Looking for Fundraising? Visible Can Help!

Start Your Free Account
Raise your next round, update investors, and track engagement all in one place.
Get Visible Free
No credit card required • Free Starter plan

Running a process to raise capital, especially before generating revenue, is a surefire way to improve your odds of success. Find ideal investors with Visible Connect, add them to your Fundraising Pipeline, and share your pitch deck all from Visible. Give Visible a free try for 14 days here.

You may also enjoy:
Customer Stories
Turning Portfolio Data Into an Advantage: Inside Emergence Capital’s Workflow
When Andrew Crinnion joined Emergence Capital as Director of Portfolio Analysis, he stepped into a role that required more than crunching numbers. As a Series A investor in B2B SaaS companies, Emergence prides itself on being data-driven, but that only works when the correct data is accessible, consistent, and actionable. The challenge? Their portfolio was growing fast, but performance tracking lived in scattered spreadsheets and inboxes. "Before Visible, it was Excel Sheets and lots of manual emails," Andrew explained. "We were a pretty data-driven firm, which gave me a good foundation. But we needed a better way to scale." A Central Source of Truth Andrew was tasked with finding a portfolio monitoring solution that could grow with their fund and simplify performance data management. After evaluating platforms like iLevel, Dynamo, and Standard Metrics, he ultimately chose Visible. What stood out? "Flexibility," he said. "The ability to build dashboards and calculate our own metrics was huge. Before, I'd ask for something like burn rate and NDR, and I wasn’t always sure how it was being calculated. So being able to calculate it within the system was a big help." The transition was smooth. After merging their existing data into a more structured format, onboarding to Visible was seamless. “It was real smooth to load that into Visible and move forward.” Driving Better Decisions With Visible in place, Andrew can surface insights faster and share them more effectively with the general partners. "Once a company responds to our Visible Request, it graphs it out. I can see if burn rate increases or if runway is dropping off, and it prompts me to ask the right questions to the GPs. It keeps us aligned." The dashboards are a core part of portfolio reviews and one-off requests alike. "They don’t really see how it’s getting made,” he said, “but it makes it a lot easier for me to answer their questions.” Better Data = Stronger LP Relationships When communicating with LPs, the value of Visible became even more clear. When LPs are digging into performance, portfolio metrics, and fund-level questions, the Emergence team is ready. "Visible helps me quickly respond to all our LP requests. I have a repository of data that makes it easy to pull what they need. It also helps GPs answer LP questions faster, with more confidence." By having a centralized system to rely on, Emergence offers transparency and builds trust with its limited partners, a key ingredient in any relationship. Turning Internal Value Into External Impact As Emergence’s data infrastructure matured, Andrew saw an opportunity to scale the value of what they were learning. Portfolio companies were coming to him with questions like, “What should my CAC payback be?” and “How much should I be spending on R&D?” Thanks to the insights they’d built internally with Visible, Emergence launched the Beyond Benchmark report, an external study based on data from over 560 companies. What began as a tool for internal alignment became a valuable resource for the broader SaaS community. Support That Scales With You Throughout the process, Visible’s Customer Success team remained a key part of the experience. “They’ve been great. I’ve shared product feedback, and it’s been implemented. They’re responsive and invested in helping us succeed.” Emergence Capital didn’t just choose Visible, they built a system around it. For funds building out platform or investor relations teams, he recommends investing early in the right metrics and infrastructure. The payoff? Faster answers, stronger LP conversations, and the confidence to scale with clarity. Check out how you can join Emergence Capital and leverage Visible for your portfolio monitoring and reporting here.
Fundraising
Lead With Your Strengths with Jonah Midanik
Operations
Storyselling with Kristian Andersen of High Alpha
Metrics and data
Using Benchmarks as a Diagnostic with Kyle Poyar