Visible Blog

When monitoring a portfolio, having the right insights at the right time is crucial. Whether it is a sudden dip in cash runway or a surge in MRR, knowing exactly when portfolio company key metrics shift can mean the difference between proactive support and missed opportunity. Our recent updates to Metric Alerts make it easier to stay connected to your portfolio’s performance. Support Companies With Smarter Alerts We have redesigned Metric Alerts to help you monitor your entire portfolio with ease, spot red flags faster, and stay connected to each company’s performance. A New Home for Alerts Metric Alerts now live in a dedicated section of your sidebar under Monitoring. Here you will find: A New Alert button for fast setup A Log View showing every triggered alert with icons, timestamps, and direct links to your portfolio metrics Easy edit access. Click the metric name or the icon button to quickly update alerts in a side panel Now you can manage all alerts in one place without any hassle. Portfolio-Wide Metric Selection You no longer need to set up alerts company by company. With the Metric Alerts, you can: Select any Portfolio Metric, such as Revenue or Runway, and apply the alert across all companies Receive notifications when a company’s metric meets a specific criteria Creating alerts across your portfolio ensures that you will never miss any shifts across your portfolio. Proactive Support Metric Alerts equip you with actionable information to stay on top of material changes. Use the Log View to track historical alerts and identify patterns Drill down to the Metric page from the alert to conduct further analysis Edit alert criteria instantly using the side-panel form Founders rely on you to be proactive, responsive, and informed. With Metric Alerts, you can stay connected to the numbers and the people behind them. Put Metric Alerts to Work The new and improved Metric Alerts are now available to all Visible customers. Whether you are looking to monitor key metrics across your entire portfolio, catch red flags sooner, or strengthen your relationships with founders through proactive insights, Metric Alerts are designed to keep you connected and in control. To explore how Metric Alerts can streamline your portfolio monitoring and support your investment strategy, head here.

Tear sheets are an important component of the venture capital industry. If you’re new to VC, it's crucial to understand what a tear sheet is and how to create a valuable and effective one for your fund. What is a Tear Sheet? A tear sheet is a single-page summary of an individual company. A tear sheet is a critical term to understand in the venture capital world. Beyond a simple understanding of what a tear sheet is, it’s important to learn how a tear sheet is best used and how to create one. The term “tear sheet” originated from pre-internet business when S&P would produce summary sheets for public companies on one page. All of these single-page summaries could be torn out of a larger book containing all of the summary sheets. This act of tearing out the relevant page stuck around. Even though the physical act of tearing a sheet is gone, the single-page summary, the tear sheet, has withstood the test of time and is an extremely important piece of collateral for anyone working in VC to understand. A tear sheet should contain overview information about a company. This should include the total investment amount, gains/losses, sector, and a summary of company performance. Essentially, anything that will allow the reader to get a quick snapshot of the business and give them an understanding of earning potential that is possible should be included on the tear sheet. The LPs (limited partners) or investors at a VC firm are a key audience that will be viewing the tear sheet. You want to make a good impression when presenting information to LPs. Therefore, when thinking about putting together tear sheets for your portfolio companies, it’s important to make them look professional and use them to effectively communicate concise updates about your companies. Well-put-together tear sheets can go a long way in impressing LPs. View Tear Sheet examples from Visible. Tear Sheet Templates When building out tear sheets for your portfolio companies, make sure to include both metrics and qualitative data about your companies. If you’re looking for a tear sheet template (read on to learn more about tear sheet templates in Visible!) make sure to find a template that includes both of these categories. Start with metrics, or quantitative data about the company. A few metrics to consider including*: Revenue – Revenue and revenue growth over time is an easy way to understand the health status of a company. While not an accurate portrayal of the company as a whole, it gives LPs a sense of the stage of the company. FTE Headcount & New Hires – This is typically considered non-sensitive data from portfolio companies but again gives LPs an idea of the stage of the company and how they’re growing over time. It also is an indicator of how a company is using their cash. True North KPIs – Depending on the type of company, this might differ. The true north KPIs in a tear sheet template should be the key performance indicators that are guiding the business every single day. Beyond revenue goals, examples of other KPIs could be active users, a customer net promoter score, active customers, or average contract value. *Note: It’s important to maintain privacy for portfolio companies and receive permission to share information with LPs. It’s also a best practice to share the same level of detail across all companies. Another important section to include on a tear sheet is an investment overview. Some items to include are: Total Invested – It’s helpful to remind LPs about the total invested in a company and how it compares to others in the portfolio. Date of Initial Investment – This gives a sense of how long it has been since the initial investment and gives context on when to expect a return. Investment Multiple – This provides LPs with an idea of the expected return in the future. Shifting from the metrics on your tear sheet template, consider the following qualitative points to include in your tear sheet: Company Tagline – This is an easy and concise way to orient or remind an LP about what the company does. Sector – This simple static property again helps provide context to LP’s who have invested in several funds. HQ Location – Helps everyone stay on top of where the portfolio is located. Narrative Update – This section is a commentary on recent highlights from the portfolio company. As always, it’s important not to disclose sensitive information about a portfolio company. Asks – Depending on your relationship with your companies and LPs, it may be appropriate to share ‘Asks’ from portfolio companies with LPs. For example: Company A is looking to hire a Head of Engineering based in Berlin and is seeking candidate referrals. Tear Sheet Examples A great place to start when creating your portfolio tear sheets and looking for tear sheet examples is to ask your network. Talk to experienced funds in your network. If they’ve raised several funds and have close relationships with their LPs, they probably have a great idea of what LPs like to see when receiving updates about portfolio companies. You can also check out Visible’s Tear Sheet Examples here. Using Visible for Portfolio Tear Sheets Visible is an incredibly useful tool for funds to report to the LPs on a consistent basis. You can take the quantitative data and qualitative information suggested above and turn it into a template right in Visible. Check out a tear sheet example in Visible below. How Visible Automatically Builds Tear Sheets Visible is the perfect tool to build tear sheets for all your companies in just a few clicks. Visible automatically builds tear sheets by: Equipping investors to automatically collect structured data from portfolio companies on a regular basis. As an investor, you can decide what data is most relevant to request from each company. Creating tear sheet templates that automatically pull in metric data, investment data, and qualitative properties that already exist within Visible. Interested in exploring how to build Tear Sheets in Visible?

About Airtree Ventures Airtree is a Sydney-based venture capital firm backing founders based in Australia and New Zealand building the iconic companies of tomorrow. The firm was founded in 2014 and is now deploying out of its 4th fund with $1.3 billion in assets under management. Their portfolio includes over 105+ portfolio companies and 250+ founders who have helped create over 17,000 jobs. Airtree’s portfolio includes the region’s breakout technology companies, such as Canva, Go1, Employment Hero, Pet Circle, Immutable, and Linktree. For this case study, we spoke to Dan Lombard who is the Data Lead at Airtree Ventures. Related article: Airtree Ventures already returned its first fund thanks to Canva while maintaining the majority of its stake Fragmented Systems and Processes Prior to Visible Prior to the integration of Visible, Airtree relied heavily on a fragmented system of spreadsheets to manage their portfolio of 105+ companies. Each quarter, four employees were tasked with managing the relationships with the points of contact at 15 to 20 portfolio companies through manual outreach and communications. This reliance on spreadsheets resulted in inefficiencies and potential data loss, as spreadsheets are prone to break when modified. Challenges With Data Accuracy and Scaling Manual Outreach to a Growing Portfolio Before Visible, 80% of Airtree’s portfolio monitoring problem was having clean data and scaling outreach to their portfolio companies. They faced two primary challenges with their former system: Operational Efficiency: Four team members spent significant time manually collecting data from over 100 companies every quarter. The Airtree team members were sending one-off email communications to each company and manually keeping track of who needed to be followed up with at each company which diverted resources from other critical projects they could be working on. Data Integrity and Scalability: Frequent changes to the data in spreadsheets resulted in errors in the sheets and data loss, which caused frustration as there was no way of understanding which changes were made to the sheet and when. This process made it difficult to scale portfolio monitoring operations as Airtree grew. Why Airtree Chose Visible as their Portfolio Monitoring Platform Airtree chose Visible for its robust, scalable, and user-friendly platform. Key factors influencing their choice included: Ease of Use and Customization: Visible's platform offered unparalleled customization and ease of use. Support and Development: Visible’s team actively listened to feedback, offered best practices, and continuously invested in their product, ensuring a partnership that catered to Airtree’s evolving needs. Automation and Integration: Visible excelled in automating portfolio monitoring and offered a frictionless experience for founders. Airtree leveraged the Visible API to seamlessly integrate data into their existing data warehouse system. Airtree’s historical data collection process, previously led by four Airtree team members, is now a streamlined process led only by Dan, who leverages Visible Requests to collect data from their portfolio of 105+ companies. Visible Requests empowers Dan to send customized link-based data requests to each company, automate the email reminder process, and easily keep track of where companies are in the reporting process. View an example Visible Request below. Onboarded to Visible within 24 Hours Visible provided Airtree with an efficient and supported onboarding. When asked about Airtree's onboarding with Visible Dan Lombard shared the following: Visible stood out by enabling a swift and seamless transition that was operational in less than 24 hours, a stark contrast to other providers who estimated a quarter for full implementation. This rapid integration was facilitated by a comprehensive onboarding template provided by Visible. Visible API & Airtree’s Data Infrastructure With the implementation of Visible, Airtree wanted to take a more sophisticated approach to the way they handle their portfolio data with the goal of driving more valuable insights for their team. The approach needed to be automated, integrate with other data sources, and have a singular view accessible for the whole team. This was not possible when their data lived in disparate systems, files, and spreadsheets. Dan Lombard has led the improvement of Airtree's data infrastructure. Now, data sources like Visible and Affinity are piped into Snowflake via recurring AWS Lambda jobs. Airtree leverages the Visible API daily. Dan mentioned that while Airtree collects data quarterly, a daily sync of the data is crucial because Airtree is always onboarding new companies, communicating with their founders, and uploading historical data. “The Visible API gives us this level of daily fidelity and only takes the AWS Lambda job 5 minutes to populate an entire data architecture.” - Dan Lombard, Data Lead at Airtree Ventures Once the data is in their database, Snowflake handles the ETL and entity matching. Airtree then has Streamlit sit on top of Snowflake to query data, provision access, and build out new insights. Advice for Other VC Firms Building Out Their Data Infrastructure Don’t overcomplicate things to start. It is easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. Dan recommends a bias towards simplicity. Start small and use it as a stepping stone as you build things out. Conclusion Airtree’s adoption of Visible transformed their portfolio management by automating key processes and centralizing data, thus enabling more strategic decision-making and efficient operations. The case of Airtree is a testament to how the right technological partnerships can profoundly impact business efficiency and data management.

Visible supports hundreds of investors around the world to streamline their portfolio monitoring. One of the most common questions we receive is — what metrics should I be collecting from my portfolio companies? Everyone from Emerging Managers writing their first checks to established VC firms ask this question because they want to make sure they're monitoring their portfolio companies in the most effective way possible. The Standard Metrics Value-Add Investors Should be Monitoring It’s important to know which metrics are the best to collect from portfolio companies so that investors can extract the maximum amount of insight from the least number of metrics. This streamlined approach is easiest for founders and allows investors to get what they need to provide better support to their companies, inform future investment decisions, and have good records in place for LP reporting or fundraising. Below we outline the six most common metrics investors collect from portfolio companies. 1) Revenue Definition: Money generated from normal business operations for the reporting period; also known as ‘net sales’. We recommend excluding ‘other revenue’ from secondary activities and excluding cash from fundraising. Revenue tells you how a company’s sales are performing. This metric is a key indicator for how a business is doing. It can be analyzed to understand if new marketing strategies are working, how a change in pricing might affect the demand for a good or service, and the pace of growth in a market. By asking for revenue from just ‘normal business operations’ you’re excluding money a company could also be making from secondary activities that are non-integral to their business. This helps keep the revenue data more precise, allows you to compare the metric more accurately across the portfolio, and will allow you to use it more accurately in other metric formulas such as Net Income. Visible helps over 400+ VCs streamline the way they collect data from companies with Requests. Check out a Request example below. 2) Cash Balance Definition: The amount of cash a company has in the bank at the end of a reporting period. Cash Balance is an important indicator of ‘life expectancy’. This metric is essential to track because it tells you about the financial stability and risk level of the company. There’s no bluffing with this Cash Balance metric. A company either has a healthy amount of cash in the bank at the end of its reporting or they don’t. Cash balance also gives you an idea of how soon a company will need to kick off its next round of financing. 3) Monthly Net Burn Definition: The rate at which a company uses money taking income into account. The monthly burn rate will be positive for companies that are not yet profitable and negative for companies that are considered profitable. Net burn is usually reported as monthly and calculated by subtracting a company’s ending cash balance from its starting cash balance and dividing that by the number of months for the period. We recommend collecting this metric from companies on a quarterly basis but still asking for the monthly rate — this helps rule out any one-off variability. Monthly Net Burn = (Starting cash balance – ending cash balance) / months Monthly Net Burn is an indicator of operational efficiency. This metric becomes even more relevant during market downturns when the focus shifts from growth at all costs to growth with operational efficiency. This is a good metric to benchmark and compare across all companies in your portfolio. You can also use this metric to calculate a key metric, Cash Runway. Related resource: Burn Rate: What It Is and How to Calculate It Related resource: How to Reduce Burn Rate: 8 Cost-Saving Strategies for Startups 4) Cash Runway Definition: Cash runway is the number of months a business can survive before it runs out of cash. It can be calculated as: Runway = Cash Balance / Monthly Net Burn Cash runway tells you when a company will run out of cash. This metric is essential because it determines when a company needs to kick off their next fundraising process, usually, it’s when they have 6-8 months of runway left. If you see one of your companies hit a cash runway of six months or less, you should be reaching out to see if they need support or guidance on their fundraising efforts. While Runway is definitely considered a key metric, you don’t need to ask your companies for it since it can be calculated easily with other data you should already have on hand (Cash Balance & Monthly Net Burn Rate). 5) Net Income Definition: Net income is a company’s total earnings (or profit) after all expenses have been subtracted. It is calculated by taking a company’s revenue and subtracting all expenses, including operational expenses, interest expenses, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Net Income = Revenue – Total Expenses Net Income is an indicator of profitability. If net income is positive, meaning revenue is greater than a company’s total expenses, it is considered profitable. This is a metric that startups should have readily available since it’s the ‘bottom line’ of an Income Statement, making it very easy to report. This metric can also be used in a formula to calculate Net Profit Margin, total expenses, and cash runway. 6) Total Headcount This is the total number of full-time equivalent employees excluding contractors. Contractors are excluded because of the variability of the nature of contract work — a contractor may only work a few hours a month or they could work 20 hours per week. This variability will cause back-and-forth clarification between you and your companies which wastes time. This metric gives you insight into company growth and operational changes. This metric is important to track because it’s a reflection of decisions made by the leadership team. If there’s an increase in headcount, the leadership is investing in future growth, on the other side, if there’s a major decrease in total headcount it could be because the leadership team has decided to reduce burn by letting people go or employees are churning. All are post-signs of operational changes worth paying attention to. Check out an Example Request in Visible. Suggested Qualitative Questions to Ask Your Companies While metrics are the best way to aggregate and compare insights across your portfolio, you may also be wondering which qualitative questions you should ask portfolio companies as well. Qualitative prompts can be a concise and valuable way for startups to share more narrative updates on company performance with their investors. Below we outline the two most common qualitative questions investors ask portfolio companies as well as suggested descriptions. 1) Recent Updates & Wins Description: Please use bullet points and share updates related to Sales, Product, Team, and Fundraising. This will be used for internal reporting and may also be shared with our Limited Partners. We suggest asking companies for bullet points on these four categories because it’s a focused way for investors to understand the narrative context behind a company’s metrics. With your companies’ permission, this narrative update can also serve as the foundation for your tear sheets for your LP reporting and your internal reporting. 2) Asks Description: How can we best support you this quarter? You can make your reporting processes more valuable for your portfolio companies by asking your companies if there are specific ways you can provide support to them in the next quarter. Once you have responses from your portfolio companies, you can take action on their requests and you’ll be able to extract support themes to inform the way you provide scalable portfolio support. Monitor Your Portfolio Companies Seamlessly With Visible It’s important to know which are the most important metrics to collect to ensure your portfolio data collection processes are streamlined and valuable both for you and your companies. In this article, we highlighted Revenue, Net Income, Cash Balance, Runway, Net Burn Rate, and Total Headcount as the top metrics to collect from all your portfolio companies. With Visible, its also easy to ask for any custom metric and assign it just to specific companies. Investors of all stages are using Visible to streamline their portfolio monitoring and reporting processes. Book some time with our team to learn how Visible can automate your portfolio monitoring processes. Visible for Investors is a founder-friendly portfolio monitoring and reporting platform used by over 400+ VCs.

Getting regular, high-quality, and actionable data from portfolio companies is important. It allows investors to make better investment decisions, provide better support to companies, and share meaningful insights internally across the firm and with LPs. This practice should also be highly valuable for founders. They should be able to share wins and challenges and seek support from their investors. The reporting process should only take companies 3 minutes to complete (if not, something may be wrong with how the investor is asking for structured data or the reporting company may not be as familiar with their key metrics as they should be). Below are some best practices to make sure you get: High response rates from companies Structured data (comparing apples to apples) Actionable insights Related resource: How to Reduce Burn Rate: 8 Cost-Saving Strategies for Startups Set Reporting Expectations Early On ✔️ Tip: Set expectations during the onboarding process (if not sooner) It’s way easier to set reporting expectations with companies early on (and with fewer companies) rather than changing your reporting requirements a few years into your relationship with portfolio companies. Some investors choose to outline their reporting expectations in a side letter as a part of the investment documents. It's recommended that investors also have a dedicated conversation around reporting expectations during the onboarding process. Related Resource: A Guide to Onboarding New Companies to Your VC Firm When and How Often to Collect Portfolio Data ✔️ Tip: Collect data at a predictable frequency Set the expectation that you will be sending a Request for company data the same time every reporting cycle. Visible has data that shows that Mondays are great due dates and if you’re sending out quarterly Requests for data, we suggest giving your companies 2-4 weeks after quarter close to get their information back to you. Don’t randomly switch between the 10th, the 30th, etc. This makes it difficult for founders to prioritize your reporting requirements and gives the impression that your due dates don’t really matter. Visible makes scheduling data Requests and subsequent reminders a breeze for investors. Investors can select the due date, email notification dates, and customize the messages that will get sent out to portfolio companies. ✔️ Tip: Collect data at an appropriate frequency We recommend the following cadences. This is 100% customizable as every fund is different. Weekly – Companies in an accelerator program Monthly – Pre-seed investments Quarterly – Pre-seed, Seed, Series A, Series B + investments What Data to Collect from Portfolio Companies ✔️ Tip: Less is more Don’t send a Request asking for ‘nice to have’ metrics. Only ask for the information you really need and are going to use. We suggest starting small, getting a rhythm, and expanding the data as needed. Metrics ✔️ Tip: Ask for only 5-15 metrics Depending on how closely you work with companies, ask for 5-15 metrics and no more. If you’re not taking actionable next steps based on a metric (ex: reporting to LP’s, providing more hands-on support, informing investment decisions) then it's likely you don't need to be asking for it. The most common metrics investors ask for include: Revenue Cash Balance Cash Burn Headcount Runway Related resource: Which Metrics Should I Be Collecting from Portfolio Companies View examples of data Requests in Visible. ✔️ Tip: Use a metric description to reduce back-and-forth If you are asking for Burn and don’t provide context, you might get 15 different variations. Should it be negative? Should it be trailing 3 months or the current month? Should it include financing? Be descriptive about what you want. Qualitative Questions to Ask Portfolio Companies ✔️ Tip: Define what type of information you're looking for As an investor, it's a great idea to give companies the opportunity to share support requests on a regular basis. Consider including a description to clarify what type of support your firm can provide companies. Additionally, most investors also ask for companies to report narrative highlights and lowlights from the question. It's important to clarify what type of information you're actually looking for so companies are not wasting time sharing information an investor is not actually going to use. Implementing a Portfolio Monitoring Platform ✔️ Tip: Notify your companies two weeks in advance Introducing Your Companies to Visible As the most founder-friendly solution on the market, we ensure that requesting data is a frictionless process for founders. This means founders don’t need to create an account in order for Investors to get value out of the platform (ie: No log-in required!). Still, it's a great idea to give your companies notice about the adoption of Visible so they can keep an eye out for the first Request that will land in their inbox. Feel free to use our Intro Copy Template to notify your companies about the adoption of Visible two weeks in advance of your first Request deadline. Customize Your Domain Investors can white-label the automatic emails that are sent from Visible so that the emails use their firm's domain. You can also customize the sender address to anyone at your firm. Visible's Customer Support All Visible customers get world-class support and a dedicated Investor Success Manager. We provide an efficient, hands-on onboarding experience, training for new team members, and support on an ongoing basis. Visible is trusted by over 350+ VC funds around the world to help streamline their portfolio monitoring and reporting.

About Moxxie Moxxie was founded in 2019 by former Twitter executive Katie Stanton. Prior to starting Moxxie Katie worked at Google, in the Obama administration as a Special Advisor to the Office of Innovation, and co-founded the angel group #Angels. In 2021, Katie brought on Alex Roetter, whom she had worked with before at both Twitter and Google, as an equal partner in Moxxie’s second fund of $85M. Alex joined Moxxie with a wealth of operational and engineering experience from previously serving as the Senior VP of engineering at Twitter for 6 years as well as working as a software engineer at Google and various other early-stage startups. Today, Moxxie has invested in over 60+ seed-stage companies in the consumer, enterprise, fintech, health tech, and climate sectors. The team at Moxxie is differentiated by their operational experience and focus on underrepresented founders. According to an article published in Forbes, out of the 27 investments from Moxxie’s first fund, 36% were founded by women, 40% by people of color, 8% by Black founders and 43% by immigrant founders. Learn more about Moxxie. This Case Study was put together in collaboration with Alex Roetter, Managing Director and General Partner at Moxxie. What Moxxie was doing prior to using Visible In the early days at Moxxie, the team used a combination of check-in calls at varying frequencies, ad-hoc meetings, and texts to gather updates from their companies. Later on, they created a Google Group email alias where founders sent their updates so the communications were all stored in one inbox. The Moxxie team kept a summary of each company in a combined Google Document that was updated irregularly. The portfolio monitoring challenges Moxxie was facing The main issue with Moxxie’s ad-hoc method was that “...it was just all very manual. It was a mish-mash of documents and hard to maintain. We were inconsistent in how up-to-date we were on different companies,” shared Alex, Moxxie’s Managing Director. The manual effort required to stay on top of portfolio companies meant portfolio monitoring was “...falling to the wayside and we were not doing as good of a job [monitoring our companies] as we needed to be.” “...it was just all very manual. It was a mish-mash of documents and hard to maintain. We were inconsistent in how up-to-date we were on different companies." It’s common for investors to feel overwhelmed as they attempt to manually keep up to date on a growing number of portfolio companies despite recognizing the benefits of doing so. Alex emphasized that the main reason Moxxie wanted to improve their portfolio monitoring was to ensure they were spending their time most effectively at their firm. It was hard to identify which companies needed their support and where Moxxie's time would be most valuably spent “...without having a regular heartbeat from [their] portfolio companies.” The reasons Moxxie chose Visible Moxxie’s founder Katie Stanton was told to check out Visible’s KPI tracking capabilities at the end of 2022 while she was attending the Equity Summit, an invitation-only gathering that brings together thought-leading LPs and GPs that drive industry change. Alex from Moxxie reached out to Visible soon after the initial referral to schedule a demo. The demo confirmed that the Visible platform had exactly what Alex was looking for in a portfolio KPI tracking tool. Moxxie's portfolio monitoring criteria included: An automated way to send structured data requests to portfolio companies A solution that wasn’t taxing on their founders Allowed founders to share their data within seconds Ability to see all their portfolio data in one clear place Ability to easily build Tear Sheets for each company Moxxie's onboarding experience with Visible Moxxie’s onboarding took approximately 9 days to complete. When asked to share feedback on Visible’s onboarding process Alex shared “Everything was great. Whenever we had bulk data in a CSV that needed to be uploaded we shared it with Visible and it was uploaded within 24 hours.” Check out additional Visible reviews on G2. How Moxxie is leveraging Visible to streamline portfolio monitoring and reporting processes today Today Moxxie doesn’t have to remember to check in with their companies or make guesses about their companies’ recent progress updates. Instead, Visible has enabled Moxxie to send automatic, recurring, structured data requests to their companies that can be completed without their founders ever having to log in or create an account. The Moxxie team is immediately notified when companies complete data Requests. From there, they are able to easily identify which companies need more support. This streamlined, founder-friendly process ensures the Moxxie team can continue to spend time on high-value fund operations, such as deal flow, while also efficiently monitoring and supporting current portfolio companies. Taking a closer look at Moxxie’s use of the Visible platform, the team primarily uses four main features on Visible: Requests, Tear Sheets, Reports, and Updates. Requests: Streamlining Moxxie’s portfolio KPI data collection process Moxxie uses Visible’s Request feature to collect 5 metrics from companies on a regular basis. The firm collects data from early-stage companies on a monthly basis and on a quarterly basis for more mature companies in their portfolio. The five metrics Moxxie collects include: Revenue Runway Cash Spend Cash Balance Headcount Moxxie also includes a qualitative text block in their Request that provides companies with an opportunity to add additional context to their metrics, share any additional updates, or ask Moxxie for support on specific items. Alex shared that likes that the Visible platform sends him a notification each time a company submits a Request. He uses this as an opportunity to quickly identify any changes to the company’s performance. Alex shared “...anytime there’s something unexpected it’s a reminder to check in with the company.” Reports: Building a custom investment data report before an annual meeting Another key feature that Moxxie is utilizing is Visible’s report feature which allows Moxxie to pull together select metrics and investment data into a single table view. Moxxie has a fund summary for both Fund I and Fund II that includes: initial ownership %, total invested, total invested from a specific fund, and the initial valuation for each company. Moxxie initially created this report to prepare for an annual meeting with LPs. They wanted to see the numbers across all their portfolio companies, be able to download the figures, and then compute averages. Tear Sheets: Creating a clear overview of individual company performance Moxxie utilizes Visible’s dashboard templates to create custom Tear Sheets for each of their companies. Moxxie’s Tear Sheets incorporate elements of their original investment memo coupled with dynamic metrics and qualitative updates that change over time. Integrating company properties into Tear Sheets The static information in Moxxie's Tear Sheets is pulled directly from companies' profiles in Visible. The information that Moxxie includes in their Tear Sheets are: Company website url Latest valuation Co-investors Founders Company summary Why we invested Status Deal source Initial ownership Initial valuation Investment date Total invested Sector HQ location Year founded Integrated dynamic charts into Tear Sheets Moxxie also incorporates data visualizations into their Tear Sheets which are automatically updated as companies submit new information to Visible. The dynamic information Moxxie includes in Tear sheets is: Monthly KPI’s in a bar chart Runway vs Headcount in a bar chart Monthly spend vs cash balance in a bar chart Revenue forecast vs actual in a bar chart Update/progress since investment in a text widget Key metrics in a text widget Company-specific metrics in a text widget View Tear Sheet examples from Visible. Updates: Communicating portfolio performance with LPs on a quarterly basis Moxxie also leverages Visible’s Updates feature to send outbound communication to their LPs and the wider Moxxie community on a quarterly basis. The firm uses Visible’s Update feature instead of its previous Google Group as a way to consolidate its tech stack. Alex shares that he finds the open rates and viewing analytics helpful so he can understand how LPs are engaging with their regular communications. Conclusion Moxxie chose to move forward with Visible’s founder-friendly portfolio monitoring solution after hearing about Visible’s KPI tracking capabilities through a credible referral. By adopting Visible, Moxxie’s ad-hoc, manual portfolio monitoring processes have been transformed into a streamlined cadence for collecting structured updates from their companies. The firm previously stored outdated company summaries in Google Documents and now the Moxxie team leverages neatly organized Tear Sheets that auto-update when companies share new information. Over 400+ VC firms are using Visible to streamline their portfolio monitoring and reporting process.

What is a Portfolio Review Meeting in Venture Capital A portfolio review meeting in the context of Venture Capital is a dedicated time for the investment and operational team members at an investment firm to align on recent updates across the portfolio. Other purposes of this meeting are to exchange cross-functional insights and coordinate the best ways to support portfolio companies. Who typically leads Portfolio Review Meetings? Portfolio review meetings can be led by anyone at the firm but since the meetings are largely focused on updates about portfolio companies, it is often led by the person responsible for collecting and synthesizing updates from portfolio companies on a regular basis. At a smaller firm, this person may be a Partner, and at a larger VC firm, this person often has the title of Platform Manager, Director of Portfolio Operations, or someone in finance. Ultimately, it should be led by someone with a wide-lens view of what is going on across the portfolio. Related Resource –> Portfolio Data Collection Tips for VCs Portfolio Review Meeting Frequency According to a poll led by Visible, 50% of VC’s are hosting Portfolio Review Meetings on a quarterly basis, followed by 29% weekly, and 14% monthly. The frequency of this meeting largely depends on the size of your portfolio company and how hands-on you are with your companies. A quarterly frequency makes sense for most VC firms because 70% of investors are collecting structured data from their companies on a quarterly basis. (Source data is aggregated usage data on Visible’s portfolio monitoring platform used by 350+ VC funds). Three Necessary Elements to Lead an Effective Portfolio Review Meeting 1) Up-to-date, accurate information from portfolio companies Most investors are collecting 5-15 metrics from companies on a quarterly basis. These include core financial KPI’s and sector-specific metrics. Additionally, it’s common to ask for qualitative updates from companies as well to ensure you have a holistic view of how a company is performing. Related Resource –> Which Metrics Should I be Collecting from My Portfolio Companies 2) Customizable visualizations to engage your team Looking at just raw data points from companies can be, well…boring. To get more engagement during Portfolio Review Meetings it’s a great idea to create engaging visualizations that clearly demonstrate the growth journeys your companies are on. By displaying your data in a Flexible Portfolio Company Dashboard your team will be able to more clearly identify trends and insights. To help your team digest the information about portfolio companies, it’s important to keep your data visualizations consistent for each company. Visible makes this easy by allowing you to save custom dashboards as templates and apply them to all companies in just a few clicks. Learn more about creating flexible dashboards for portfolio review meetings in the video below. 3) A Place to Take Notes & Document Action Items It’s a great idea to document meeting discussion notes and action items as soon as they arise during a meeting. Documenting action items on a company’s dashboard is a great way to keep team members accountable for execution because you can refer back to the notes during future meetings. How Investors Are Leveraging Visible to Enhance Portfolio Review Meetings VKAV’s Portfolio Company Dashboards Verod-Kepple Africa Ventures (VKAV), a long-term Visible user, hosts a formal Portfolio Review Meeting on a quarterly basis. During this meeting, Portfolio Review Committee members join to review the performance of the portfolio companies during the quarter. Additionally, VKAV’s investment team holds an internal Portfolio Review Meeting every other week. Right now, the purpose of this meeting is mostly to check the status of action items (either for VKAV or the portfolio company). VKAV keeps track of open action items directly on a company’s dashboard in Visible so that it is linked to the broader context of how the company is performing. View VKAV’s Portfolio Review Dashboard Example –> View Dashboard 01 Advisors Approach to Portfolio Review Meetings 01 Advisors a San Francisco-based venture firm utilizes Visible’s Request feature to streamline the way they collect data from companies on a quarterly basis. The team meets 1-2 times per quarter for an internal Portfolio Review meeting. Check out their meeting agenda outline below. 01 Advisors Portfolio Review Meeting Agenda Investment Strategy Portfolio Company Categorization Reserve Allocation Strategy Portfolio Company Support Learn more about how 01 Advisors uses Visible for the internal portfolio review meetings in this video.

Managing your fund data isn't just about when you initially invested; it's about understanding the whole story over the investment's lifetime. We’ve reworked the investments feature in your portfolio view to provide enhanced flexibility and a more streamlined view. See the Full Story Behind Every Investment To date, you've been able to track investments in Visible. Now, you can more easily associate investment transactions with rounds and track associated cash flows. The updated investments experience makes room for these scenarios and gives you the flexibility to track them cleanly and accurately. Increased Flexibility and Organized Tabs We’ve introduced a new tabbed layout within each company profile so you can easily toggle between different categories of investment data: Introducing Transactions Tab Log any inflow or outflow related to a company (investments, exits, distributions, interest payments, dividends, and more). Each cashflow includes fields for the name, amount, date, type, description, and associated round (if applicable). A summary at the top makes it easy to see inflows and outflows. You might receive interest payments as a company pays down debt Distributions could be tied to performance thresholds or revenue share agreements Rounds Tab The rounds tab expands on what previously existed in Visible. Now, you can create a round and associate multiple transactions with the round in the event you invested out of multiple funds or acquired different share classes. FMV Tab The FMV tab consolidates how the value of your positions have changed over time, making it easy to understand the story of your investment performance. Improved Investment Tracking Workflows The new transaction tab will not only support additional new transaction types but also help improve workflows for tracking investment data. When you log a new investment or exit, we’ll automatically create a corresponding cashflow entry to save you time, and you can always edit or override the details as needed. If a cash flow is tied to a round, we’ll pre-fill certain fields to make data entry easier, while still giving you control over things like the date (especially useful when the transaction date differs from the round close date). You can also create custom transactions that aren’t tied to a specific round. Whether you’re receiving a one-off dividend or logging a revenue-based return, the process is quick and flexible. A Clearer Picture of Performance With more complete transaction tracking, you can: Calculate IRR with greater accuracy Understand the full financial journey of each investment Organize capital movement in a way that’s easy to reference, analyze, and share No more stitching together spreadsheets or guessing at timing. Everything you need is now in one place. The new investments model is live! Log in to your Visible account or request a call with our team below to learn more:

As more capital flows into venture as an asset class, investors are increasingly competing for LP dollars and space on the cap table from the best founders they work with. Gone are the days when capital is enough of a differentiator for a VC fund to get on a hot startup’s cap table. Considering the average VC + Founder relationship is 8-10 years (longer than the average marriage in the US) — founders are beginning to look for a true partner out of a VC fund. In order for a VC fund or emerging fund manager to stand out among other funds, they need to have the data and systems in place. LPs have increasingly higher expectations for fund performance while founders have increasingly higher expectations for VC funds. About this Report The goal of this report is to break down the best practices we see hundreds of VC use to collect and share their portfolio data. We outline best practices related to: Market Data Overview Timing of Data Requests Number of Metrics to Collect Most Common Metrics The Founder Experience Qualitative Questions Minimum Viable Data Request Company Success = Fund Success Venture capital funds are only as successful as their portfolio companies. There are few people who have been in a founder’s shoes and can help them navigate the challenges they are facing. However, investors are in a unique position as they’ve likely seen many portfolio companies and potential investments face the same challenges. In order to best help portfolio companies, investors need to have a strategy in place to collect both qualitative and quantitative data from their portfolio companies. Collecting a few KPIs and company asks is a great place to start (more on this later in the report). At the same time, there is a balance between helping and being a burden on a portfolio company. Download our report to learn some simple best practices so you can collect the data you need without burdening your portfolio companies

As a venture capital investor, you know that clear, actionable portfolio insights can mean the difference between informed decisions and missed opportunities. That’s why we created Our Guide to Portfolio Reports in Visible — a comprehensive resource to help you streamline how you visualize, analyze, and communicate insights about your portfolio companies. In this guide, you’ll discover: Common metrics that top VC firms track, such as Revenue, Cash Balance, and Runway. Segmentation strategies that enable deeper analysis by Fund, Market, or Partner. How to use Visible Portfolio Reports to consolidate portfolio data into one view. Examples of portfolio reports showcasing real-world insights from leading firms. Join 590+ venture capital funds already using Visible to uncover insights, fill reporting gaps, and make data-driven decisions faster. Are you ready to take your portfolio reporting to the next level? Download the guide below:

Investing in startups is a high-stakes game where success hinges on more than just a great idea- it's about the team behind it. In this article, we'll explore startup team risk, why it matters, and how you can evaluate it to make smarter investment decisions. From assessing leadership styles to understanding team dynamics, you'll gain actionable insights into minimizing risks and maximizing your investment potential. Whether you're an investor or a founder, this guide will help you navigate the complexities of startup team evaluation, setting the stage for long-term success. What is Startup Team Risk? Startup team risk refers to the potential challenges and uncertainties associated with the individuals and collective team responsible for driving a startup’s success. This risk encompasses several factors, including the team's dynamics, skill sets, and leadership styles, which can significantly impact the startup's ability to execute its business plan effectively. Team dynamics are crucial in how well team members collaborate and navigate challenges. A team with strong interpersonal relationships and clear communication channels is more likely to work cohesively and make swift, informed decisions. Conversely, poor dynamics can lead to conflicts, miscommunications, and delays, ultimately threatening the startup's progress​. Skill sets are another critical component of team risk. A startup team should have diverse complementary skills, ensuring that all aspects of the business- from product development to marketing- are well-managed. Gaps in key skills or overlapping competencies can create inefficiencies and slow progress​. Leadership style is equally important, setting the tone for the entire organization. Effective leadership inspires the team, fosters innovation, and drives the startup forward. However, weak or autocratic leadership can stifle creativity, lead to poor decision-making, and increase turnover, heightening the risk of failure​. Related resource: The Startup's Handbook to SAFE: Simplifying Future Equity Agreements Why Startup Team Risk Evaluation Matters Evaluating startup team risk is crucial because the success of any startup largely depends on the people behind it. A thorough assessment of the team’s strengths, weaknesses, and dynamics can reveal potential risks that might otherwise go unnoticed. These insights influence investment decisions and impact the startup's growth trajectory. Understanding team risk helps investors make more informed choices, reduces the likelihood of failure, and ensures that startups have the leadership and skills needed to thrive. In the following sections, we’ll explore how team risk affects investment decisions, contributes to startup growth, and offers benefits for founders who proactively assess and mitigate these risks. Investment Decisions Team risk is a critical factor that directly influences investor confidence and decision-making. When evaluating a startup, investors are not just betting on a product or market opportunity but on the team’s ability to execute the business plan effectively. A strong, cohesive team with the right mix of skills and leadership qualities can instill confidence, signaling that the startup is more likely to navigate challenges and succeed. Conversely, a team with noticeable gaps in expertise, poor leadership, or dysfunctional dynamics raises red flags, potentially deterring investment​. Investors often prioritize teams with a proven track record, relevant industry experience, and demonstrated success in previous ventures. These factors reduce perceived risk, as they indicate the team has the knowledge and resilience to overcome obstacles. Additionally, leadership style is closely scrutinized, as effective leadership is essential for maintaining focus, motivating the team, and driving the startup forward​. In contrast, signs of team instability- such as high turnover, lack of transparency, or unresolved conflicts- can severely undermine investor confidence. Even if a startup has a promising product or significant market potential, concerns about the team’s ability to execute can lead investors to hesitate or withdraw entirely from the investment opportunity​. Startup Growth A well-evaluated team is a cornerstone of startup growth. When a startup assembles a team with complementary skills, strong leadership, and effective communication, it creates a foundation to propel the company forward. Such teams are better equipped to innovate, adapt to market changes, and scale operations effectively. Strong team dynamics enable quick decision-making, foster creativity, and build a resilient organizational culture, all essential for sustainable growth​. Real-life examples of startups that thrived due to strong team dynamics and leadership are abundant. For instance, Airbnb’s success can be attributed not only to its innovative platform but also to the complementary strengths of its co-founders. Brian Chesky, Joe Gebbia, and Nathan Blecharczyk each brought unique skills to the table- design, engineering, and business acumen- crucial in overcoming early challenges and scaling the company globally​. Their ability to work cohesively and shared vision for the company allowed them to pivot effectively when needed, such as when they expanded their services to include experiences alongside accommodations. Another example is Slack, which benefited from Stewart Butterfield's strong leadership. His experience and ability to lead a team through developing a successful product (initially as a side project) were pivotal in transforming Slack into a communication powerhouse used by millions of professionals worldwide. The team’s shared commitment to creating a user-friendly, effective communication tool and Butterfield’s strategic vision helped the startup achieve exponential growth​. For Founders Founders can gain significant advantages by proactively evaluating their team's risks. By identifying potential weaknesses or gaps in skills, leadership, or team dynamics early on, founders can take steps to address these issues before they become critical problems. This self-assessment can lead to a more resilient, cohesive team, ultimately driving better performance and increasing the chances of the startup’s success​. Here are a few tips for founders to self-assess and improve their teams: Conduct Regular Self-Assessments: Periodically evaluate the team’s strengths and weaknesses. Use tools like 360-degree feedback or team assessment matrices to gain insights into areas that need improvement. This will help you identify skills gaps, leadership challenges, or communication issues that could hinder progress​. Encourage Open Communication: Foster a culture of transparency and open dialogue within your team. Regularly check in with team members to understand their concerns, ideas, and feedback. This not only helps in identifying potential risks but also strengthens team cohesion and trust. Diversify Your Team: Ensure your team has a diverse mix of skills, backgrounds, and perspectives. A diverse team is more likely to come up with innovative solutions and is better equipped to navigate challenges. Assess whether your team’s current composition allows for this and make strategic hires if necessary​. Invest in Leadership Development: Strong leadership is crucial for any startup. Invest in leadership development for yourself and your key team members. This could include training, mentoring, or simply learning from the experiences of successful entrepreneurs. Effective leadership will help guide the team through tough times and keep everyone aligned with the startup’s vision. Address Conflicts Early: Don’t let conflicts fester. Address them as soon as they arise to prevent them from escalating and disrupting the team’s progress. Implement conflict resolution strategies and ensure that all team members feel heard and valued during disputes​. How to Determine the Biggest Risks for Startup Teams Identifying key risk factors within startup teams is essential for both investors and founders who want to ensure the long-term success of their ventures. Several methods can help uncover these risks, allowing stakeholders to take proactive measures to mitigate them. Conduct Thorough Due Diligence Due diligence is the cornerstone of risk identification. This process involves a deep dive into the backgrounds of key team members, including their professional histories, track records in previous ventures, and any potential red flags such as high turnover or unresolved conflicts in their past roles. This step is crucial for verifying the credentials and experience of the team, ensuring that they have the necessary expertise to drive the startup forward​. Perform Background Checks:Background checks can reveal critical information that might not be apparent in interviews or resumes. This includes checking for any legal issues or past professional conduct that could pose a risk to the startup. These checks also provide insight into the team’s reliability and trustworthiness, which are vital for maintaining investor confidence​. Engage with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs):Consulting with SMEs can provide valuable perspectives on what to look for when assessing team risks. Experts often recommend focusing on the following areas: Cohesion and Communication: Assess whether the team communicates effectively and collaborates well. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings, delays, and conflicts that could jeopardize the startup’s progress​. Leadership and Vision: Evaluate the leadership’s ability to inspire and guide the team. A lack of clear vision or weak leadership can result in a lack of direction, making it difficult for the team to stay focused on long-term goals​. Adaptability and Resilience: Determine how well the team can adapt to changes and overcome challenges. Startups often face unpredictable market conditions, so a team’s resilience is a key indicator of its ability to navigate adversity​. Observe Team Interactions:Sometimes, the best insights come from simply observing how team members interact with one another. This can be done during meetings, brainstorming sessions, or even in informal settings. Pay attention to the dynamics—whether there is mutual respect, whether disagreements are handled constructively, and whether there is a clear alignment of goals. Positive interactions often correlate with a lower risk of internal conflict and a higher likelihood of success​. Steps for Evaluating the Risk of Startup Teams Evaluating the risk of startup teams is a multifaceted process that requires a combination of structured assessments, personal interactions, and observational insights. The following sections will outline specific steps you can take to thoroughly evaluate startup teams, helping you identify potential risks and make informed decisions. Each step provides a detailed approach to uncovering the strengths and weaknesses of the team, ensuring that you invest in startups with the highest potential for success. 1. Conduct Team Assessments Conducting thorough team assessments is a critical first step in evaluating startup team risk. These assessments provide a comprehensive understanding of the team's strengths, weaknesses, dynamics, and potential areas of concern. Here are some strategies and tools that can help in conducting these assessments effectively: Use a Team Evaluation Matrix: A Team Evaluation Matrix is a structured framework that allows you to assess various aspects of the team systematically. Key criteria typically include experience, skills, leadership, cohesion, and commitment. Each criterion is rated on a scale (e.g., 1 to 5), providing a visual representation of where the team excels and where there are potential gaps. This tool helps in identifying areas that require further investigation or improvement​. Implement 360-Degree Feedback: 360-degree feedback involves collecting feedback from multiple sources, including peers, subordinates, and supervisors, to get a holistic view of each team member's performance and behavior. This method is particularly useful in understanding how team members are perceived by their colleagues and how they contribute to the overall team dynamics. It can highlight strengths such as leadership and collaboration, as well as areas for development like communication or conflict resolution​. Conduct Behavioral Assessments: Behavioral assessments, such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) or DISC assessments, can provide insights into the personality traits and working styles of team members. Understanding these traits can help predict how individuals might react under pressure, how they prefer to communicate, and how they are likely to fit within the team structure. These assessments can also identify potential personality clashes that could lead to conflict​. Leverage Psychometric Testing: Psychometric tests measure cognitive abilities, emotional intelligence, and other psychological attributes. These tests can reveal how team members process information, make decisions, and handle stress. By understanding these cognitive and emotional factors, investors and founders can better predict how well the team will perform in high-stakes situations common in startups​. Observe Team Interactions: Beyond structured assessments, observing team interactions during meetings or brainstorming sessions can provide invaluable insights into the team’s dynamics. Pay attention to how decisions are made, how conflicts are resolved, and whether all voices are heard and respected. This observational approach can help uncover underlying issues that might not surface in formal assessments but are critical to team cohesion and success​. 2. Interview Key Team Members Interviewing key team members is a crucial step in evaluating startup risk. These interviews provide a direct window into the team’s dynamics, individual competencies, and potential red flags. To make the most of these interviews, it's important to follow best practices that not only reveal each member’s strengths but also uncover potential risks that might not be apparent from resumes or assessments alone. Best Practices for Interviewing Startup Team Members: Prepare Structured yet Flexible Questions: Begin with a set of structured questions that address the critical areas you need to explore, such as leadership experience, problem-solving skills, and team collaboration. However, remain flexible to allow the conversation to evolve naturally. This balance helps ensure that you cover all necessary topics while also allowing for deeper insights into unexpected areas. Focus on Behavioral Questions: Behavioral interview questions are designed to uncover how candidates have handled situations in the past, which can be predictive of future behavior. For example, asking “Can you describe a time when you had to navigate a significant challenge within your team?” can reveal a lot about the candidate’s problem-solving abilities, leadership style, and resilience under pressure​. Assess Cultural Fit and Alignment with Company Vision: Understanding whether a candidate aligns with the startup’s culture and vision is essential. Questions like “How do you see your role evolving as the company grows?” or “What excites you most about our mission?” can help determine if the candidate is not only capable but also genuinely motivated by the company’s goals​. Successful Interview Techniques Used by Investors: The “Inverted Pyramid” Technique: Start with broad, open-ended questions to let the candidate showcase their overall thinking and approach. Gradually narrow down to more specific queries that focus on their role in past projects or specific situations. This technique helps investors gauge both strategic thinking and attention to detail. The “Five Whys” Approach: This method involves asking "why" repeatedly (usually five times) to dig deeper into the reasoning behind a candidate's decision or action. For instance, if a candidate describes a decision to pivot a product, the interviewer would ask why that decision was made, followed by another “why” based on their response. This technique uncovers the root motivations and thought processes, revealing deeper insights into a candidate's decision-making capabilities​. Stress Testing Questions: Presenting hypothetical scenarios that are intentionally challenging can help assess how candidates handle stress and uncertainty. For example, asking, “If your two top developers left suddenly, how would you handle the project’s next critical deadline?” can reveal their crisis management skills and ability to prioritize under pressure​. Role Reversal Interviews: In this technique, the interviewer asks the candidate to switch roles and act as the interviewer. This can provide insights into what the candidate values most in team members, their understanding of the business, and their critical thinking skills. It also helps to assess how they might approach hiring or managing their own teams​. 3. Analyze Team Members Understanding team dynamics is critical to evaluating a startup's overall health and potential. Team dynamics refer to the relationships and interactions among team members, which can significantly impact productivity, innovation, and the ability to navigate challenges. Positive team dynamics can propel a startup toward success, while negative dynamics can lead to internal conflicts, reduced morale, and, ultimately, failure. Importance of Understanding Team Dynamics: Team dynamics influence how well a team works together, how decisions are made, and how conflicts are resolved. A team that communicates effectively and supports one another is more likely to adapt to changes, overcome challenges, and innovate successfully. Conversely, poor team dynamics, such as unresolved conflicts, lack of trust, or misaligned goals, can hinder a startup’s progress and even lead to its collapse​. Methods for Observing and Evaluating Team Interactions: Participate in or Observe Meetings: One of the most direct ways to understand team dynamics is by observing team meetings. Pay attention to how team members communicate- are all voices heard, or does one person dominate the conversation? Are decisions made collaboratively, or is there tension and disagreement? Observing these interactions provides valuable insights into the team’s decision-making processes and how well members collaborate​. Conduct Team-Building Exercises: Team-building activities can help reveal the underlying dynamics of a team in a less formal setting. These exercises encourage collaboration and can highlight both the strengths and weaknesses of team interactions. The way team members handle tasks together in these scenarios often reflects how they will perform in high-pressure situations​. Use Peer Evaluations: Peer evaluations can provide honest feedback about team members from their colleagues. These evaluations help identify how each member is perceived within the team, uncovering issues like poor communication skills, lack of participation, or conflict-inducing behavior that might not be visible to external observers​. Positive and Negative Team Dynamics and Their Impact: Positive Dynamics: Positive team dynamics are characterized by trust, open communication, mutual respect, and shared goals. In such environments, team members are more likely to share ideas, take risks, and support each other through challenges. This fosters innovation and helps the startup adapt quickly to market changes. For example, companies like Google and Apple have thrived partly due to their strong team cultures, where collaboration and creativity are deeply embedded in their operations. Negative Dynamics: On the other hand, negative team dynamics, such as frequent conflicts, lack of trust, or poor communication, can severely hamper a startup’s growth. Teams that struggle with these issues often face delays in decision-making, reduced morale, and high turnover, which can drain resources and impede progress. In extreme cases, these negative dynamics can lead to the dissolution of the startup. A notable example is the early challenges faced by Uber, where internal conflicts and a toxic culture led to significant setbacks. 4. Evaluate Entrepreneur Leadership Assessing the effectiveness of a startup’s leadership is crucial because strong leadership can make or break a startup, particularly in its early stages. Effective leaders steer the company toward its goals and inspire and empower their teams to perform at their best. Evaluating leadership involves looking at tangible and intangible outcomes that contribute to a leader's ability to guide the startup through challenges and opportunities. How to Assess the Effectiveness of Startup Leadership: Review Track Record and Experience: One of the most direct ways to assess leadership effectiveness is by examining the leader’s past successes and failures. Look at their history with previous startups or relevant industry experience. Leaders who have successfully navigated previous ventures are more likely to possess the skills needed to guide a new startup. However, it’s also important to consider how they’ve handled failures, as this can provide insights into their resilience and ability to learn from mistakes​. Evaluate Decision-Making Skills: Effective leaders make informed, strategic decisions that align with the startup’s long-term goals. Assess their ability to analyze situations, weigh options, and make tough calls under pressure. This can be evaluated through interviews or by reviewing past decisions and their outcomes. Leaders who consistently make decisions that drive the company forward demonstrate a strong understanding of the business and market dynamics​. Observe Leadership Style and Team Interaction: The way a leader interacts with their team can reveal much about their leadership effectiveness. Leaders who foster a positive, inclusive environment where team members feel valued and empowered are often more successful in building high-performing teams. Conversely, leaders who are autocratic or fail to communicate effectively can create a toxic culture that stifles innovation and productivity​. Traits and Skills to Look for in Startup Leaders: Visionary Thinking: A strong leader has a clear vision for the startup’s future and the ability to communicate this vision compellingly to their team, investors, and stakeholders. Visionary leaders are not only focused on current success but also on long-term growth and innovation​. Resilience and Adaptability: Startups often face unexpected challenges, and leaders must be resilient in adversity. The ability to adapt to changing circumstances, pivot strategies when necessary, and maintain focus on the end goal is crucial for startup leaders. This resilience is often a key factor in whether a startup can survive its early stages and grow​. Emotional Intelligence (EQ): Leaders with high emotional intelligence are better equipped to manage their own emotions and understand and influence the emotions of others. This trait is vital for building strong relationships within the team, managing conflicts, and maintaining morale during tough times​. Decisiveness: Startups operate in fast-paced environments where delays in decision-making can be costly. Effective leaders are decisive and able to make quick, informed decisions without getting bogged down by analysis paralysis. This decisiveness must be balanced with careful consideration of risks and benefits​. Integrity and Ethical Leadership: Integrity is the foundation of trust within the team and with external stakeholders. Leaders who demonstrate honesty, transparency, and a strong ethical compass are more likely to inspire loyalty and commitment from their team and foster a positive organizational culture​. Factors to Consider When Evaluating the Risk of a Startup Team Evaluating the risk associated with a startup team involves a comprehensive analysis of various factors that can significantly impact the startup’s success. Understanding these factors can help investors and founders identify potential red flags and proactively mitigate risks. The following sections will explore critical areas to focus on, including experience and expertise, diversity and inclusion, and communication and collaboration. Each of these elements plays a vital role in shaping the effectiveness and resilience of the startup team. Related resource: 9 Signs It’s Time To Hire in a Startup Experience and Expertise The relevance of experience and expertise within a startup team is one of the most critical factors in determining the potential success of the venture. A team with the right mix of industry experience, technical skills, and entrepreneurial know-how is more likely to navigate the complexities of building a startup, avoiding common pitfalls, and capitalizing on opportunities. Here's why experience and expertise matter and how to verify them. Importance of Relevant Experience and Expertise: Industry Knowledge:Teams with experience in the relevant industry are more likely to understand market dynamics, customer needs, and competitive landscapes. This knowledge enables them to make informed decisions, tailor their product or service to market demands, and anticipate industry trends. For example, a team with deep knowledge of fintech is better positioned to innovate within that sector, understanding regulatory requirements and leveraging industry-specific technology​. Technical Skills:Expertise in key technical areas, such as software development, product design, or operations, is crucial for executing the startup’s vision. A team with these skills can efficiently build and scale their product, maintain quality, and optimize processes, all of which are essential for growth. A lack of technical expertise can lead to delays, increased costs, and product failures​. Entrepreneurial Experience:Previous startup experience, particularly in founding or scaling a company, provides valuable lessons that can be applied to new ventures. Teams with this background are often more adept at fundraising, managing resources, and pivoting strategies when necessary. Their experience can help them avoid common mistakes that first-time entrepreneurs might make​. How to Verify Team Members’ Credentials and Past Successes: Review Professional Histories:Start by examining the resumes and LinkedIn profiles of key team members. Look for evidence of relevant experience, such as previous roles in similar industries or successful stints at other startups. Pay attention to the impact on those roles, such as leading successful projects or driving growth initiatives. Check References and Testimonials:Contact former colleagues, supervisors, or business partners to gain insights into the team members’ work ethic, problem-solving abilities, and professional reputation. These references can provide a more nuanced view of their capabilities and how they performed in real-world situations. Testimonials from credible sources can also bolster confidence in the team’s expertise​. Investigate Past Achievements:Look for concrete evidence of past successes, such as successful product launches, awards, or significant contributions to previous companies. This might include case studies, press coverage, or documented outcomes that showcase their ability to deliver results. Such achievements are strong indicators of the team's potential to succeed in their current venture​. Analyze Publicly Available Information:Use tools like LinkedIn, industry publications, and databases such as Crunchbass. You can look into publicly available information about previous startups they were involved in, such as funding rounds, exit outcomes, or growth metrics​. Diversity and Inclusion Diversity and inclusion significantly reduce team risk by bringing various perspectives, experiences, and skills to the table. A diverse and inclusive startup team is better equipped to innovate, solve complex problems, and understand the needs of a broader customer base. This diversity can lead to more creative solutions and a greater ability to adapt to changes, ultimately contributing to the long-term success of the startup. The Role of Diversity and Inclusion in Reducing Team Risk: Enhancing Problem-Solving Capabilities:Diverse teams bring together individuals with different backgrounds, experiences, and ways of thinking. This variety enhances problem-solving capabilities as team members approach challenges from multiple angles, leading to more innovative and effective solutions. When a team consists of members with varied perspectives, they are less likely to overlook potential issues and more likely to identify creative opportunities that a more homogenous team might miss​. Mitigating Groupthink:Inclusion fosters an environment where all team members feel valued and encouraged to share their ideas. This reduces the risk of groupthink, where a lack of diverse opinions can lead to poor decision-making. Inclusive teams are more likely to engage in healthy debates, consider alternative viewpoints, and make better-informed decisions, reducing the likelihood of costly mistakes​. Broadening Market Understanding:A diverse team is more likely to reflect the diversity of their market. This understanding can lead to developing products and services that better meet the needs of different customer segments, enhancing the startup's ability to compete in a global market. For example, a team with diverse cultural backgrounds can more effectively navigate international markets, avoiding missteps and better tailoring offerings to local preferences. Benefits of Having a Diverse and Inclusive Startup Team: Increased Innovation:Diverse teams are more innovative because they combine different ideas, perspectives, and experiences. Studies have shown that companies with diverse leadership are more likely to develop new products and enter new markets. This innovation is crucial for startups that must differentiate themselves and continuously evolve in competitive markets. Improved Employee Satisfaction and Retention:Inclusive workplaces tend to have higher employee satisfaction and retention rates. Employees who feel included and respected are more engaged, motivated, and committed to their work. This positive work environment can reduce turnover, saving the startup time and resources for hiring and training new staff​. Better Decision-Making:A diverse team is better equipped to make sound decisions. Research shows that diverse groups consider more information and process it more carefully than non-diverse groups, leading to better outcomes. This improved decision-making is particularly valuable in the fast-paced startup environment, where the ability to make quick, informed decisions can be a competitive advantage​. Communication and Collaboration Effective communication and collaboration are essential components of a successful startup team. These factors significantly reduce team risk by ensuring that all members are aligned, informed, and working together towards common goals. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings, missed opportunities, and conflicts, while strong collaboration fosters innovation, efficiency, and a supportive work environment. How Effective Communication and Collaboration Reduce Team Risk: Minimizing Misunderstandings:Clear communication ensures that all team members agree regarding objectives, responsibilities, and expectations. This reduces the risk of misunderstandings leading to errors, delays, or project failures. When communication is effective, team members can quickly address issues as they arise, preventing them from escalating into bigger problems​. Enhancing Problem-Solving:Collaborative teams are more effective at problem-solving because they can leverage the collective knowledge and skills of the group. By working together, team members can identify potential risks early and develop more robust solutions. This collaborative approach reduces risk and leads to more innovative and well-rounded outcomes​. Building Trust and Cohesion:Open and transparent communication helps build trust among team members, which is crucial for effective collaboration. When team members trust each other, they are more likely to share ideas, take risks, and support one another, leading to a more cohesive and resilient team. This trust is particularly important in a startup environment, where teams often face high levels of uncertainty and need to rely on each other to navigate challenges​. Methods for Evaluating Communication and Collaboration: Conduct Team Surveys:Regularly surveying team members about their communication experiences can provide insights into how effectively information is shared and understood within the team. These surveys can highlight areas where communication may be breaking down and identify opportunities for improvement​. Observe Team Interactions:Observing how team members interact during meetings, brainstorming sessions, and everyday work can reveal much about their communication and collaboration dynamics. Look for signs of active listening, respectful dialogue, and the willingness to consider different viewpoints. Positive interactions typically indicate strong communication practices. Use Collaboration Tools Analytics:Many collaboration tools, such as Slack, Asana, or Trello, offer analytics to help evaluate team communication. Metrics such as the frequency of updates, task completion rates, and responsiveness can quantitatively measure how well the team collaborates and communicates​. Examples of Strong Communication Practices Leading to Successful Outcomes: Case of Pixar Animation Studios:Pixar is known for its strong communication and collaboration culture. The company practices "Braintrust" meetings, where teams provide candid feedback on ongoing projects without fear of retribution. This open communication has been credited with helping Pixar produce a string of successful and critically acclaimed films, allowing teams to address problems early and collaboratively find solutions​. Example of IDEO:IDEO, a global design company, encourages a culture of collaboration through "collaborative design thinking." Teams work closely across disciplines, sharing ideas freely and iterating on concepts together. This approach has led to innovative solutions and successful product designs, illustrating the power of effective collaboration​. Build Stronger Startup Success with Visible Evaluating startup team risk is essential for investors aiming to maximize their chances of backing successful ventures. Key areas such as experience, diversity, communication, and leadership are critical in determining a team’s potential. However, managing and tracking these elements can be challenging. Visible provides investors with powerful tools to monitor team dynamics, track key performance indicators, and stay informed about the startups they’ve invested in. By using Visible, investors can gain deeper insights, make more informed decisions, and ultimately build stronger, more resilient portfolios. Start using Visible today to enhance your investment strategy and ensure your startups are on the path to success. Related resource: Business Venture vs Startup: Key Similarities and Differences

Investing can be a solitary journey, but it doesn't have to be. Joining an online community of like-minded investors can provide valuable insights, opportunities, and support needed to enhance your investment strategies. In this article, we’ll dive into seven of the best online communities tailored for investors, ranging from exclusive professional networks to vibrant platforms for retail investors. Whether you’re seeking high-quality research, early-stage startup opportunities, or real-time market data, these communities offer something for everyone. 1. SumZero SumZero is an exclusive online community tailored for professional investors, particularly those working in hedge funds, mutual funds, and private equity. Since its launch in 2008, SumZero has been dedicated to fostering a collaborative environment where buy-side analysts and portfolio managers can share detailed research, investment insights, and ideas. The platform serves as a vital resource for serious investors who depend on high-quality, peer-reviewed research to make informed decisions. Members of SumZero include professionals from some of the most prestigious investment firms worldwide. The community is composed of hedge fund managers, mutual fund analysts, and other buy-side professionals who seek to exchange ideas and collaborate on sophisticated investment strategies. Key benefits of SumZero include an extensive research database filled with in-depth investment theses, a buy-side analyst performance ranking system, and exclusive job opportunities within the finance sector. Additionally, the platform offers a compensation database, allowing members to anonymously compare their earnings with their peers, adding extra value to the community. Who’s SumZero Best For? SumZero is perfect for professional investors prioritizing high-quality, peer-reviewed research and insights to guide their investment strategies. It is particularly valuable for those in hedge funds, mutual funds, and private equity, where deep analysis and collaboration are essential. Moreover, SumZero provides unparalleled networking opportunities, connecting members with top-tier investment professionals worldwide. 2. FundersClub FundersClub is a pioneering online platform focused on venture capital and startup investments. Established in 2012, it was one of the first online venture capital firms, providing accredited investors with direct access to high-potential, early-stage startups. The platform's primary goal is to democratize venture capital by enabling a broader range of investors to participate in startup funding opportunities traditionally reserved for a select few. FundersClub’s portfolio includes over 370 startups, with a collective portfolio valuation exceeding $30 billion. The highly selective platform offers investment opportunities in only the top 1-2% of startups it reviews. Investors on FundersClub can easily diversify their portfolios by investing in various startups across different industries, with relatively low minimum investment requirements. Key features of FundersClub include a comprehensive vetting process for startups, ensuring that only the most promising opportunities are presented to investors. Additionally, the platform offers a range of educational resources to help investors understand the nuances of venture capital and startup investing. Members also benefit from networking opportunities within the FundersClub community, composed of successful entrepreneurs, business leaders, and seasoned investors​. Who’s it Best For? FundersClub is ideal for investors who are particularly interested in exploring startup opportunities. It provides direct access to a curated selection of vetted startups, allowing investors to make informed decisions confidently. The platform is especially beneficial for diversifying their investment portfolios with high-growth potential ventures. In addition to investment opportunities, members gain access to valuable educational resources and networking events that enhance their understanding of the startup ecosystem and connect them with like-minded investors​. 3. Dumb Money Dumb Money is a dynamic online community focused on collaborative investment strategies, making it particularly appealing to retail investors. Founded by three investors who turned a small initial sum into millions, Dumb Money has grown into a well-known brand with a significant presence on platforms like Reddit and Discord. The community’s primary goal is to democratize investing by crowdsourcing ideas and sharing real-time insights into the stock market. The content on Dumb Money is diverse and engaging, ranging from live investment discussions and stock market analysis to podcasts and YouTube videos. The platform encourages open discussions where members can share their investment ideas, debate strategies, and gain insights from the experiences of others. The community's discussions often revolve around trending stocks, market news, and emerging investment opportunities across various sectors. Key benefits of Dumb Money include weekly live sessions where the founders reveal their latest investments and thought processes, a podcast that offers regular updates and insights, and a comprehensive Discord server where members can interact, share ideas, and access various research tools. The community is highly collaborative, with members actively participating in discussions and contributing to a shared pool of investment knowledge​. Who’s it Best For? Dumb Money is best suited for retail investors who enjoy a collaborative and interactive approach to investing. It's particularly beneficial for those interested in crowdsourced investment ideas and real-time discussions about market trends. The platform's focus on community-driven insights allows members to learn from each other and participate in a collective investment strategy. With interactive content like live sessions and a bustling Discord server, Dumb Money offers a rich environment for those looking to stay engaged with the market and connect with like-minded investors. 4. Intch Intch is a cutting-edge platform designed to connect investors with startups and other investors, fostering meaningful networking and collaboration. The platform leverages AI-powered matchmaking tools to pair users with relevant investment opportunities, business partners, and peers, creating a dynamic environment where investors can find and engage with startups that align with their interests and goals. Intch’s primary focus is on creating valuable connections in the startup ecosystem. Whether you’re an investor looking for your next big opportunity or a startup founder seeking funding and partnerships, Intch provides the tools and resources to facilitate these connections. The platform stands out for its personalized approach, using advanced algorithms to match users based on their preferences and needs. Key features of Intch include its matchmaking tools, which help investors discover startups and other investors who share similar goals and interests. Additionally, Intch offers access to exclusive events, resources, and a collaborative environment that encourages exchanging ideas and knowledge. The platform is designed to streamline the networking process, making it easier for users to build meaningful connections and explore new investment opportunities. Who’s it Best For? Intch is ideal for investors looking to expand their network and discover new investment opportunities, particularly within the startup ecosystem. It’s especially beneficial for those who value targeted networking, as the platform’s AI-driven matchmaking tools make connecting with like-minded startups and peers easy. Additionally, Intch offers a collaborative environment with access to exclusive events and resources, making it a valuable tool for anyone looking to engage more deeply with the startup community. 5. Corner of Berkshire & Fairfax Corner of Berkshire & Fairfax is a prominent online forum dedicated to value investing. Its focus is on the investment philosophies of Warren Buffett and Prem Watsa. This platform serves as a gathering place for professional and serious individual investors interested in deep, thoughtful discussions about long-term investment strategies and value-oriented investment ideas. The forum offers a wealth of content and resources, including discussions on specific companies, market trends, and investment strategies. Members frequently share detailed analyses, book recommendations, and insights into investment philosophies that align with value investing principles. The platform also includes dedicated sections for discussions on Berkshire Hathaway, Fairfax Financial, and other value-oriented companies, making it a treasure trove for those interested in these particular firms. Key features of Corner of Berkshire & Fairfax include its large and active community, where members contribute to discussions on a wide array of investment topics. The forum’s structure allows for organized conversations, with separate boards for general discussions, investment ideas, books, and personal finance. The platform also supports networking and communication among its members, offering an environment where investors can share ideas and insights in a collegial atmosphere​. Who’s it Best For? Corner of Berkshire & Fairfax is best suited for professional investors and serious individual investors who are looking for a comprehensive online forum dedicated to value investing. The platform particularly benefits those who appreciate in-depth discussions and insights from other experienced investors. Members gain access to a wealth of collective knowledge and the opportunity to network and communicate with other professionals in the investment community. 6. Stocktwits Stocktwits is a popular social media platform designed specifically for investors, offering a unique combination of real-time market data and social investing. Launched in 2008, Stocktwits has become a go-to platform for investors who want to stay updated on market trends, discuss investment strategies, and follow trending stocks in real-time. The platform operates similarly to Twitter, with users posting short messages, known as "tweets," about their investment ideas, market observations, and stock picks. Stocktwits focuses heavily on providing real-time data and fostering a community-driven approach to investing. Investors can follow specific stocks, track trending tickers, and engage in conversations with other users who share similar interests. The platform’s social nature makes it a vibrant space for exchanging ideas, getting a pulse on market sentiment, and staying informed about the latest market movements. Key features of Stocktwits include interactive charts that allow users to visualize stock performance, sentiment analysis tools that gauge the mood of the market based on user posts, and trending tickers that highlight which stocks are getting the most attention. The platform also offers streams where users can follow the latest discussions and insights on various stocks and sectors, making it a valuable resource for real-time market engagement​. Who’s it Best For? Stocktwits is ideal for investors who thrive on real-time market discussions and data. It’s particularly beneficial for those who want to follow trending stocks, connect with other investors, and stay engaged with the market throughout the trading day. The platform’s interactive charts, sentiment analysis, and community-driven insights offer a dynamic and interactive way to participate in the market, making it a perfect fit for active investors and traders​. 7. LiquidityFinder LiquidityFinder is a specialized platform designed to connect finance and fintech professionals, traders, businesses, and organizations with liquidity providers across global financial markets. Founded by industry veteran Sam Low in 2019, LiquidityFinder has grown into a comprehensive social network that caters specifically to the needs of financial market professionals. The platform's primary purpose is to simplify the process of sourcing reliable and competitive liquidity solutions, ranging from traditional FX and CFD liquidity to cutting-edge digital assets and crypto liquidity. In December 2022, LiquidityFinder evolved into a community-driven platform, emphasizing networking and collaboration among its members. It now functions not just as a marketplace for liquidity solutions but also as a vibrant community where financial professionals can engage, share knowledge, and stay informed about industry developments. The platform offers advanced tools like the Match Matrix and multi-provider request forms, which help users efficiently find and connect with the right liquidity providers for their needs. Key features of LiquidityFinder include a robust directory of liquidity providers, market news and analysis, industry insights, and a specialized jobs board focused on finance and fintech roles. Members can create profiles, participate in forums, and use in-site messaging to connect with potential partners, fostering a collaborative environment that supports business growth and professional networking​. Who’s it Best For? LiquidityFinder is ideal for investors, traders, and financial market professionals seeking comprehensive liquidity solutions and networking opportunities. The platform is particularly beneficial for those who need detailed information about liquidity providers and want to engage with a community of industry peers. With tools like the Match Matrix for finding the right providers and a specialized jobs board for career opportunities, LiquidityFinder offers a unique and focused environment that helps users grow their businesses and professional networks​. Connect with the Top Online Investor Communities Today Engaging with the right online investor communities can significantly boost your investment knowledge, provide valuable networking opportunities, and offer access to exclusive resources. To further enhance your investment strategy, consider using Visible- designed to help you manage your portfolio, track performance, and connect with other investors seamlessly. Ready to elevate your investment journey? Sign up with Visible today and take the next step in optimizing your investment portfolio. Related resources: 9 Tips for Effective Investor Networking How To Find Private Investors For Startups How to Find Investors

Venture Capital investors expect their portfolio company founders to be on top of their key financial metrics at all times. Why? Because it fosters confidence in investors when CEOs demonstrate they’re making data-informed decisions about the way their company is operating. On the flip side, Venture Capital investors should be just as familiar with their own key performance indicators, aka fund metrics. A great way to impress Limited Partners is to demonstrate you have a deep understanding of both how fund metrics are calculated and why they matter to LPs. In this article, we define the key fund metrics every fund manager should always have at the ready, why they are important, how they are calculated, and why they matter to LPs. Related resource: Venture Capital Why Limited Partners (LPs) Need to Understand VC Fund Performance Understanding VC fund performance metrics is crucial for LPs because it goes beyond mere numbers—these metrics serve as vital indicators of a fund’s health, growth potential, and long-term value. By grasping these concepts, LPs can make more informed decisions, manage their portfolios effectively, ensure transparency, meet regulatory requirements, and plan for the future. Here's why these metrics are essential: Investment Decision-Making For LPs, investment decisions are about more than just selecting promising funds; they’re about strategically allocating capital to maximize returns and manage risk. By understanding key performance metrics, LPs can evaluate how well a fund is performing compared to others, identify trends, and make data-driven decisions on where to invest. Metrics like Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Total Value to Paid-in-Capital (TVPI) help LPs assess the potential return and growth of their investments, ensuring that they are putting their money in the right places. Portfolio Management Effective portfolio management requires continuous monitoring and adjustment. LPs use performance metrics to track the progress of their investments and decide when to rebalance their portfolio. For instance, the Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC) can help LPs determine the overall value generated by a fund, while the Residual Value to Paid-in-Capital (RVPI) provides insights into the unrealized potential of current investments. These metrics enable LPs to identify underperforming funds early and make necessary adjustments to optimize their portfolio’s performance. Related resource: Portfolio Management Reporting and Transparency Transparency is key in maintaining trust between fund managers and LPs. Regular and accurate reporting of performance metrics ensures that LPs are fully informed about the status of their investments. Metrics like Distributions to Paid-in-Capital (DPI) offer a clear view of the returns that have been realized, fostering confidence and trust. Transparent reporting also allows LPs to hold fund managers accountable, ensuring that their investment strategies align with the agreed-upon goals and timelines. Regulatory and Compliance Requirements VC funds operate under stringent regulatory frameworks that require meticulous reporting and compliance. Understanding and accurately calculating performance metrics help LPs ensure that their investments adhere to these regulations. For example, IRR calculations provide a comprehensive view of an investment’s performance over time, including the time value of money, which is often required in regulatory filings. Compliance with these standards not only mitigates legal risks but also enhances the credibility and reliability of the fund. Long-Term Planning Long-term financial planning is essential for LPs to meet their future capital needs and investment goals. By analyzing metrics like TVPI and IRR, LPs can project future returns and plan accordingly. These projections help in setting realistic expectations and strategies for reinvestment, cash flow management, and eventual exits. Understanding the long-term implications of their current investments enables LPs to build a robust and sustainable investment portfolio that can withstand market fluctuations and deliver consistent returns. Related resource: LP Reporting VC Performance Fund Metrics to Track Tracking the right performance metrics is essential for understanding the health and potential of a VC fund. These metrics offer insights into various aspects of fund performance, from immediate returns to long-term value. By knowing which metrics to track and when to use them, LPs and fund managers can make more informed decisions and better manage their investments. In this section, we’ll introduce the fundamental metrics used to evaluate VC fund performance: Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC), Gross Total Value to Paid-in-Capital (TVPI), Residual Value to Paid-in-Capital (RVPI), Distributions to Paid-in-Capital (DPI), and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Each of these metrics serves a specific purpose and is relevant in different stages of the investment lifecycle. Related resource: Portfolio Support for VCs Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC) Definition: MOIC is considered the most common fund metric and is used to determine the value of a fund relative to the cost of its investments. In other words, it measures the amount gained on investments. Anything above a 1.0x is considered profitable. MOIC can be an effective way for LPs to compare the performance of the Venture Capital funds they’ve invested in; however, because it includes both unrealized and realized value, it’s not a true indicator of fund performance. How It’s calculated: (Unrealized Value + Realized Value) / Total Invested into the Fund Why it matters to LPs: MOIC is a straightforward metric that measures how much value the fund as a whole is generating over time. Related resource: Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC): What It Is and How to Calculate It Gross Total Value to Paid-in-Capital (TVPI) Definition: TVPI demonstrates the overall performance of the fund relative to the total amount of capital paid into the fund to date. A TVPI of 1.5x means for every $1 an LP invested, they’re projected to get $1.5 in value back as a return. How It’s calculated: (Total Distributions + Residual Value) / Paid-in-capital = TVPI OR DPI + RVPI = TVPI Why it matters to LPs: This is an important metric for LPs because it demonstrates how much money they’ve (individually) received back to date from the fund as well as how much they are predicted to receive (residual value) after all the all assets (companies) have been sold as it relates to their (individual) investment. LPs like to use TVPI because it’s straightforward to calculate and hard to manipulate. LPs will be ok with TVPI’s lower than 1 for the first few years but then will start expecting to see an TVPI of 1 or higher as your company’s hopefully get marked up in value and you start distributing fund back to LPs. Related Resource: TVPI for VC — definition and why it matters Residual Value per Paid-in-Capital (RVPI) Definition: RVPI is the ratio of the current value of all remaining investments (after the GPs have done their mark up and mark downs) within a fund compared to the total contributions of LP’s to date. It essentially tells LPs the value of companies that hasn’t been returned (yet!) compared to how much has been invested. How It’s calculated: Residual Value / Paid in Capital = RVPI Why it matters to LPs: LPs want to know the likely upside of investments that haven’t been realized yet. For this reason, LPs are likely comparing your RVPI against funds with the same vintage. Distributions per Paid-in-Capital (DPI) Definition: DPI is the ratio of money distributed (returned) to LP’s by the fund, relative to the amount of capital LP’s have given to the fund. How It’s Calculated: Distributions / Paid-in-capital = DPI Why it matters to LPs: LPs will be comparing your RVPI and DPI numbers to understand where your portfolio is at in terms of maturity. A high DPI means you’re portfolio is more mature because you’ve already been able to start making distributions back to your LPs as opposed to just have a high residual (potential payout) value. Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Definition: IRR is the second runner-up for the most common fund metric. IRR shows the annualized percent return that’s realized (or has the potential to be realized) over the life of an investment or fund. A high IRR means the investment is performing well (or is expected to perform well). If you’re a seed stage investor you should be targeting at least a 30% IRR according to Industry Ventures. How It’s Calculated: Because of the advanced nature of this formula it’s best to use an excel based calculator to calculate IRR or a platform like Visible.vc which automatically calculates IRR for you. Related Resource –> What is Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for VCs Why it matters to LPs: IRR gives LPs a way to measure the performance (or predicted performance) of their investments before other profitability metrics are available. This metric, unlike the others listed above, takes into account the time value of money, which gives LPs another perspective to evaluate your fund performance and compare it to other asset classes. Check out the week from Revere VC below to get a better understanding of when each fund metric is relevant. Venture fund metrics can get confusing. MOIC, TVPI, DPI, IRR … ???? Beyond formulas, we teach our analysts about when to use them ⬇️ Fund still deploying? MOIC. Investment window closed? TVPI. Fund starts harvesting? DPI. Historical performance when fund is complete? IRR. — Revere VC (@Revere_VC) February 17, 2023 Tracking and Visualizing Fund Metrics in Visible It’s important to make sure you understand not only how to calculate your key fund metrics but also why they matter to LPs; this way you can add an insightful narrative about your fund performance in your LP Updates. Visible equips investors with automatically calculated fund metrics and gives GPs the tools they need to visualize their fund data in flexible dashboards. Dashboards can be shared via email, link, and through your LP Updates. Visible supports the tracking and visualizing of all the key fund metrics including: MOIC TVPI RVPI DPI IRR and more. Visible lets investors track and visualize over 30+ investment metrics in custom dashboards. Over 400+ Venture Capital investors are using Visible to streamline their portfolio monitoring and reporting. Learn more.

We pride ourselves on building the most founder-friendly and frictionless tools on the market. We’re excited to announce three new ways we are changing the game for how founders can share data and report back to their investors. Let’s take a step back for a moment. Founders are tasked with many roles. In addition to building a product, hiring top talent, and growing their business, founders must manage relationships with current and potential investors. As an investor, collecting the data most useful to your firm can feel like a balancing act, as you need enough data for your LPs and your portfolio insights. However, great investors want to respect the founder's bandwidth and being overly burdensome. Our recent set of Visible Request improvements has bridged the reporting gap and made sharing data with investors easier for founders. Check out three recent improvements to help make things easier for your founders below: Pre-Fill Data Points With Known Data Firms using Visible are getting portfolio company data into Visible in multiple ways, with requests, uploading historical data, and using the Visible AI Inbox. This means they already have data points in Visible for some portfolio companies when sending a Visible Request. With pre-filling data points, you now have the option to allow founders to use existing data points when filling out a request. Founders will have a chance to review exisitng data and fill in any gaps. View Historical Request Responses When completing a Visible Request, it can be helpful for founders to have context of their previous responses. For founders completing Visible Requests, they can now compare the current requests with their historical responses to help ensure they’re sharing the same information from request to request. Autosaving Requests Lastly, we now securely autosave partial completions when completing Visible Requests. Founders can also sign up for their free Visible account to save progress (cross-browser) and collaborate with their executives. Leverage Founders First Tools for Your Firm Ready to build a powerful portfolio monitoring system for your firm while staying founder first? Schedule a call with our team to learn how you can use Visible to centralize portfolio company data, build powerful dashboards, and uncover new insights.

Internal rate of return (IRR) for VCs is the expected annualized return a fund will generate based on a series of cash flows over the duration of the fund, which is typically ten years. Unlike fund metrics such as RVPI, TVPI, and DPI, which are based on multiples, IRR takes into account the time value of money. IRR can be used to measure both fund performance and the performance of an individual investment. Related Resource → VC Fund Metrics 101 What makes IRR hard to predict in a fund context is cash flows happen at irregular periods because capital calls are made by funds on an as-needed How Is IRR Used by LPs IRR is a critical metric for Limited Partners (LPs) in venture capital, helping them make informed investment decisions by benchmarking a fund’s performance against its peers. By considering the time since the initial cash outflow and comparing it against similar funds in the same asset class, LPs can assess the efficiency and profitability of their investments. IRR's significance lies in its ability to account for the time value of money, providing a more nuanced view of an investment's potential returns over time. This makes it an invaluable tool for evaluating both short-term and long-term fund performance. For example, an LP might use IRR data to compare the performance of different funds launched in the same year, helping to identify which fund managers consistently deliver higher returns. Cambridge Associates is a well-known resource that publishes quarterly benchmarks and statistics, compiling data from thousands of fund managers and their funds. These benchmarks allow LPs to compare their fund’s IRR against a broad spectrum of data, ensuring they have a comprehensive understanding of their fund's performance relative to the market. You can check out their reports here on the Cambridge Associates website. In practical terms, an LP might look at the IRR of a prospective fund to decide whether to commit capital, comparing it against the IRRs of existing funds in their portfolio and the broader market. For instance, if a new fund has an IRR significantly above the median benchmark provided by Cambridge Associates, it might be seen as a more attractive investment opportunity. How Is IRR Calculated for Venture Capital Funds? Wrapping your head around the IRR formula can quickly put your brain in a pretzel so it’s recommended to use Excel, Google Sheets, or a platform like Visible to calculate IRR. In the IRR equation below, we’re solving for the discount rate (or the expected compound annual rate of return) that makes the net present value of an investment zero. IRR is calculated by solving for the rate of return (“r”) of a series of cashflows (“C”) over a period of time (“n” to the total number of periods “N”): Accurate cash flow data is crucial in calculating IRR because even small errors can significantly affect the result. For venture capital funds, it’s essential to meticulously track all cash inflows and outflows. This includes capital calls, management fees, expenses, and distributions to LPs. Using platforms like Visible can streamline this process by providing tools to automate and track these cash flows accurately. Check out this article for an example calculation of IRR within the fund context. IRR vs. CAGR While IRR and CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) are both metrics used to evaluate the performance of investments, they serve different purposes and are calculated differently. Understanding these differences is crucial for investors when analyzing investment returns. What is CAGR? CAGR stands for Compound Annual Growth Rate and measures the mean annual growth rate of an investment over a specified period longer than one year. It provides a smoothed annual rate of return, assuming that the investment grows at a consistent rate each year. CAGR is particularly useful for comparing the historical performance of investments over time, as it neutralizes the effects of volatility and provides a straightforward percentage growth rate. Key Differences Between IRR and CAGR: 1. Consideration of Cash Flows: CAGR assumes a single investment and does not account for intermediate cash flows. It provides a geometric mean return over the period. IRR, on the other hand, takes into account the timing and magnitude of all cash flows, including intermediate inflows and outflows, providing a more detailed picture of the investment's performance. 2. Calculation Complexity: CAGR is simpler to calculate as it only requires the beginning value, ending value, and the number of periods. IRR is more complex, involving iterative calculations to find the rate that sets the NPV of all cash flows to zero. 3. Reinvestment Assumption: CAGR does not make any assumptions about reinvestment rates. It purely reflects the compounded annual growth rate. IRR assumes that interim cash flows are reinvested at the same rate as the IRR, which can sometimes be unrealistic. 4. Application Context: CAGR is often used to compare the performance of investments, funds, or portfolios over time, providing a clear picture of historical growth. IRR is widely used in capital budgeting and private equity/venture capital to evaluate the profitability of individual projects or investments, considering the specific timing of cash flows. IRR vs. ROI While IRR and ROI (Return on Investment) are both crucial metrics for evaluating the performance of investments, they serve distinct purposes and are calculated differently. Understanding these differences is key for investors when analyzing their investments. What is ROI? ROI stands for Return on Investment and measures the gain or loss generated on an investment relative to its initial cost. It is a straightforward metric that indicates the efficiency and profitability of an investment. Key Differences Between IRR and ROI: 1. Consideration of Time: ROI does not account for the time value of money. It provides a snapshot of profitability without considering how long the investment was held. IRR incorporates the time value of money, giving a more accurate reflection of an investment's performance over time by considering the timing of cash flows. 2. Calculation Complexity: ROI is easy to calculate and understand, making it a popular choice for quick assessments of investment performance. IRR is more complex, requiring iterative calculations to find the rate that sets the net present value of all cash flows to zero. 3. Reinvestment Assumptions: ROI does not make any assumptions about reinvestment of returns. IRR assumes that interim cash flows are reinvested at the same rate as the IRR, which can sometimes be unrealistic. 4. Application Context: ROI is often used for short-term investments and simple comparisons. It is particularly useful for evaluating the overall profitability of different investments without delving into the timing of returns. IRR is widely used in capital budgeting and private equity/venture capital to evaluate the profitability of projects or investments with multiple cash flows over time. Defining VC Fund Cash Flows Understanding the cash flows of a VC fund is crucial for accurately calculating metrics like IRR. The timing and magnitude of these cash flows significantly impact the fund's overall performance. Let’s delve into the types of cash flows in VC funds, their timing, and their implications for IRR. Cash Outflow Examples Capital Calls: These are requests by the VC fund to its LPs to provide a portion of the committed capital for specific investments. For example, if a fund decides to invest $1 million in a startup, it might issue a capital call for $1 million from its LPs. The timing of these calls is crucial; delaying capital calls can enhance IRR by reducing the time period over which the capital is invested. Management Fees: Typically, VC funds charge annual management fees, often around 2% of the committed capital. For instance, a $100 million fund might charge $2 million annually to cover salaries, operational costs, and other expenses. These fees reduce the net returns to LPs, impacting the net IRR​​​​. Fund Expenses: These include legal fees, administrative costs, and technology expenses. For example, a fund might incur $100,000 annually in legal and administrative fees, which also affect net returns. These expenses are necessary for the day-to-day operations of the fund but reduce the overall returns available to LPs. Cash Inflows Examples Distributions: These are returns to LPs from the fund's investments, usually following a liquidity event such as an acquisition, merger, or IPO. For example, if a portfolio company is acquired for $10 million, the proceeds distributed to LPs constitute a cash inflow. Early and large distributions can significantly boost IRR. Dividends and Interest: Occasionally, portfolio companies might pay dividends or interest on convertible notes. For example, a company might distribute $50,000 in dividends annually to the VC fund, contributing to cash inflows. These payments can provide a steady stream of returns, enhancing the IRR by providing earlier cash flows. Impact of Timing on Cash Flows: The timing of cash flows is critical in calculating IRR. Here’s why: Early Distributions: Receiving returns early in the fund's life can significantly enhance IRR because it reduces the period over which the capital is at risk and increases the annualized return. For instance, an early exit that returns capital within the first three years can result in a much higher IRR compared to a similar exit occurring in year seven. Delayed Capital Calls: By calling capital only when necessary, funds can avoid having large sums of uninvested capital, which would otherwise result in a lower IRR due to what is known as "cash drag." For example, if a fund delays a $1 million capital call by two years, it improves IRR by reducing the period the capital is deployed. Lumpy Cash Flows: Venture capital investments often result in irregular, or lumpy, cash flows. Large inflows from a significant exit can cause IRR to spike, while periods with no inflows might show a temporary decline in IRR. Managing these irregularities is a key challenge for fund managers. Examples and Implications for IRR: Example 1: A VC fund invests $2 million in a startup and exits three years later with a $10 million return. The IRR calculation will consider the initial $2 million outflow and the $10 million inflow three years later, likely resulting in a high IRR due to the substantial gain over a relatively short period. Example 2: Another fund might make smaller, incremental investments over time, leading to multiple capital calls and varied exit timings. If these exits are delayed, the IRR might be lower compared to a fund with early, significant exits. Want to learn more about tracking key fund metrics in Visible? Gross vs Net IRR When evaluating a venture capital fund's performance, it's essential to understand the difference between Gross IRR and Net IRR. Both metrics provide insights into the fund's returns, but they account for different factors and expenses, offering distinct perspectives on performance. Gross IRR: Gross IRR represents the annualized rate of return on an investment before deducting any fees or expenses. This metric focuses solely on the performance of the fund's investments, providing a measure of the raw investment skill of the fund managers. For example, if a fund invests $1 million and it grows to $2 million over three years, the Gross IRR calculation would not consider management fees, carried interest, or any other expenses incurred by the fund. This gives an unfiltered view of the investment returns generated by the fund's portfolio. Net IRR: Net IRR, on the other hand, accounts for the deductions of all management fees, fund expenses, and carried interest. This metric reflects the actual return the LPs receive after all fund management costs are considered. For instance, if the same $1 million investment grows to $2 million but incurs $200,000 in management fees and $100,000 in carried interest, the Net IRR would be lower than the Gross IRR. This adjusted figure provides a more accurate reflection of the returns that LPs can expect to receive. Key Differences and Implications: 1. Fee Consideration: Gross IRR does not include management fees, fund expenses, or carried interest. Net IRR includes these fees, providing a realistic view of the returns to LPs. 2. Performance Benchmarking: Gross IRR can be useful for comparing the investment performance across different funds without the influence of varying fee structures. Net IRR is crucial for LPs as it reflects the actual profitability of their investment after all costs are accounted for. 3. Decision Making: Gross IRR helps in assessing the raw investment skills of fund managers. Net IRR aids LPs in making informed decisions about where to allocate their capital based on the net returns they can expect to receive. By understanding Gross and Net IRR, investors can gain a comprehensive view of a fund's performance, ensuring they make well-informed investment decisions. Unrealized vs. Realized IRR When analyzing a venture capital fund's performance, it is crucial to distinguish between Unrealized IRR and Realized IRR. These metrics reflect different stages of the investment process and provide insights into both current valuations and actual returns. Unrealized IRR: Unrealized IRR includes both actual profits and theoretical gains based on the current valuations of the portfolio companies that have not yet been liquidated. This metric is forward-looking and speculative, as it assumes that the current valuations of the investments will be realized upon exit. For example, if a fund holds equity in a startup currently valued at $10 million but has not yet sold its stake, the unrealized gains contribute to the Unrealized IRR. This provides an optimistic view of the fund's potential returns but is subject to market fluctuations and the eventual success of the exits. Realized IRR: Realized IRR, on the other hand, only includes the actual cash flows that have been received from liquidated investments. This metric is based on historical data and provides a concrete measure of the returns that have been distributed to the LPs. For instance, if a fund invested $1 million in a company and later sold its stake for $5 million, the $4 million profit would be included in the Realized IRR. This figure gives a reliable measure of the fund's performance based on actual returns. Key Differences and Implications: 1. Valuation Basis: Unrealized IRR is based on current valuations and future projections. Realized IRR is based on actual, historical cash flows. 2. Reliability: Unrealized IRR can be speculative and subject to change based on market conditions and the success of future exits. Realized IRR provides a dependable measure of past performance. 3. Use Case: Unrealized IRR is useful for assessing the fund's potential future returns and the current value of its portfolio. Realized IRR is crucial for understanding the fund's actual profitability and historical performance. The IRR J-CURVE The IRR J-Curve describes the typical pattern of IRR over the lifespan of a venture capital fund. It illustrates how IRR typically decreases in the early years of a fund and then rises sharply in the later years as investments mature and exits occur. Understanding the J-Curve is essential for both fund managers and LPs as it has significant implications for investment strategy and expectations. Understanding the J-Curve: In the early stages of a venture capital fund, significant capital outflows occur as the fund invests in startups and incurs management fees and operational expenses. These outflows typically result in a negative IRR during the initial years, which is often called the "valley of death" in the J-Curve. As time progresses, some portfolio companies start to mature and achieve liquidity events such as acquisitions, mergers, or IPOs. These events generate cash inflows, which are distributed back to the LPs, causing the IRR to rise. Eventually, the IRR may surpass the initial negative values and reach a positive and often substantial rate of return as more successful exits occur. Implications for Fund Managers and LPs: 1. Expectation Management: Fund Managers: Need to communicate the J-Curve effect to LPs, explaining that early negative returns are typical and part of the investment process. This helps manage expectations and reduce concerns during the initial years. LPs: Should understand that initial negative returns do not necessarily indicate poor fund performance. Instead, they reflect the natural investment cycle in venture capital. 2. Investment Strategy: Fund Managers: Should strategically plan capital calls and investments to optimize the timing and magnitude of cash inflows. Delaying capital calls until necessary can minimize early outflows and improve the overall IRR. LPs: Need to be patient and maintain a long-term perspective, recognizing that the most significant returns typically occur later in the fund's lifecycle. 3. Performance Evaluation: Fund Managers and LPs: Both parties should use the J-CCurve as a benchmark for evaluating fund performance. Comparing the fund's IRR progression to the expected J-Curve can provide insights into whether the fund is on track or if adjustments are needed. Example: Consider a venture capital fund with a 10-year lifecycle. In the first three years, the fund experiences negative IRR due to capital outflows for investments and fees. By year five, one of the portfolio companies is acquired, generating a significant cash inflow. This event causes the IRR to rise sharply, marking the beginning of the upward curve. By the end of the fund's lifecycle, several successful exits have occurred, resulting in a high positive IRR that exceeds the initial negative values. Related resource: J-Curve and IRR Putting IRR into Vintage Context When evaluating the performance of VC funds, it's essential to consider the vintage year—the year in which the fund began deploying capital. Comparing funds within the same vintage year allows for a fair assessment, as these funds are subject to similar market conditions and economic cycles. Understanding the vintage year context can significantly impact the interpretation of a fund's RR. Relevance of Comparing Funds within the Same Vintage Year: 1. Consistent Market Conditions: Funds of the same vintage year are exposed to the same macroeconomic environment, including interest rates, inflation, and market sentiment. These factors heavily influence investment opportunities and outcomes. 2. Economic Cycles and Performance: Economic cycles, including periods of expansion and recession, affect the availability of capital, the number of viable startups, and exit opportunities. Funds started in an economic downturn may acquire investments at lower valuations but might struggle with exits if the downturn persists. Conversely, funds launched during economic booms might invest at higher valuations but benefit from more lucrative exit opportunities as the economy continues to grow. Impact of Market Conditions and Economic Cycles Market conditions and economic cycles play a critical role in determining the performance of VC funds. Funds launched during bullish markets typically experience different growth trajectories compared to those started in bearish markets. Bullish Market Example: A fund started in 2010, a period of economic recovery and growth, may benefit from a favorable market environment, leading to higher valuations and more exit opportunities. This can result in higher IRRs compared to funds from other vintage years. According to Cambridge Associates, funds from the 2010 vintage year have shown robust performance due to strong market conditions and increased IPO activities​​. Bearish Market Example: In contrast, a fund launched in 2001 during the dot-com bust faced a challenging environment with limited exit opportunities and lower valuations. Such funds might initially show lower IRRs, reflecting the tough economic conditions during their early years. A study by Preqin indicates that vintage 2001 funds had lower early IRRs but showed significant improvement as the market recovered and exit opportunities increased​​. Examples Illustrating Vintage Year Impact on IRR: 1. Vintage Year 2008: Funds started in 2008 faced the immediate aftermath of the financial crisis. Initial IRRs were likely low due to the challenging investment climate. However, those funds that managed to survive and deploy capital strategically during the downturn might have seen substantial IRR increases as the economy recovered in the following years. As per a report from PitchBook, vintage 2008 funds showed a notable uptick in IRR after 2012, correlating with the broader economic recovery and increased M&A activities. 2. Vintage Year 2015: Funds launched in 2015 benefited from a prolonged period of economic growth and technological innovation. High valuations and active IPO markets provided numerous exit opportunities, resulting in strong IRRs. Cambridge Associates' benchmark data shows that vintage 2015 funds had higher median IRRs compared to previous years, driven by successful exits in sectors like technology and healthcare. By placing IRR in the context of vintage years, investors can better understand the performance of their VC investments relative to market conditions and economic cycles. This contextual understanding helps in making more informed decisions and setting realistic expectations for future fund performance. Considerations of IRR The IRR is a valuable metric for assessing the performance of VC investments. However, it has several limitations and should be used cautiously. Understanding these flaws and the contexts in which IRR may be inappropriate can help investors make more informed decisions. 1. Sensitivity to Cash Flow Timing: Explanation: IRR is highly sensitive to the timing of cash flows. Even small changes in the timing of cash inflows or outflows can lead to significant variations in the IRR calculation. Implication: This sensitivity can sometimes provide a misleading picture of an investment's performance, especially if the cash flows are irregular or unpredictable, which is common in venture capital investments. Example: If a fund delays a significant cash inflow by just a few months, the IRR can change dramatically, potentially misrepresenting the true performance of the investment​​ . 2. Reinvestment Assumptions: Explanation: IRR assumes that interim cash flows are reinvested at the same rate as the IRR itself. This assumption can be unrealistic, particularly in volatile markets where finding equally profitable reinvestment opportunities is challenging. Implication: This can lead to an overestimation of the investment’s performance if the actual reinvestment rate is lower than the calculated IRR. Example: If a fund generates an IRR of 20% but can only reinvest interim returns at a rate of 5%, the actual performance will be lower than the IRR suggests . 3. Multiple IRRs: Explanation: In cases where an investment has alternating positive and negative cash flows, there can be multiple IRRs that satisfy the NPV equation. This can create confusion and ambiguity. Implication: Multiple IRRs make it difficult to determine the actual rate of return, complicating the decision-making process. Example: A project with cash flows that include significant inflows followed by large outflows might yield more than one IRR, making it unclear which rate accurately represents the investment's performance . 4. Lack of Scale Sensitivity: Explanation: IRR does not account for the scale of the investment. A small project with a high IRR might be less attractive than a larger project with a slightly lower IRR if the latter generates significantly higher absolute returns. Implication: Investors might prioritize projects with high IRRs without considering the overall size and absolute returns of the investment, potentially missing out on more lucrative opportunities. Example: A $1 million investment yielding a 30% IRR might seem attractive, but a $10 million investment with a 20% IRR could provide substantially greater total returns​​ . 5. Inappropriate for Short-Term Investments: Explanation: IRR is less meaningful for short-term investments because it annualizes the return, which can exaggerate the performance of short-duration projects. Implication: Using IRR for short-term investments can give a skewed perception of performance, making short-term gains appear disproportionately attractive. Example: An investment with a 50% return over six months might show an extremely high annualized IRR, but this does not reflect sustainable long-term performance . Situations Where IRR is Not Appropriate: Projects with Non-Standard Cash Flows: When investments have non-standard or erratic cash flows, IRR may not provide a reliable measure of performance. Comparing Different Sized Investments: When comparing investments of significantly different sizes, IRR can be misleading as it does not reflect the absolute value of returns. Short-Term Investments: IRR can exaggerate the perceived performance for short-term projects, making it less useful for accurate comparison. Tracking IRR in Visible Visible lets you track and visualize over 35+ key fund metrics including IRR in one place. Get started with calculating your IRR by leveraging Visible's investment data features. Track the round details for your direct investments and follow on rounds. By utilizing Visible, investors can better understand their fund’s performance, streamline data management, and improve decision-making processes, ultimately driving better investment outcomes. Related resource: Investor Update Dashboard Market Penetration Strategy Important Venture Capital Metrics Important Startup Financials